
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: July 25, 2013

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comA practitioner commented many years ago that the effectiveness of a tax planning technique can be measured by the strength of government opposition to it. One need only look at the President’s tax plan and the Treasury’s General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2013 Proposals (page 80) to see that Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs) are effective.
A GRAT is a trust to which the Grantor transfers property in exchange for an annuity to be received for a period of time selected by the Grantor. The transfer to the GRAT is reported as a gift at the fair market value of the property reduced by the annuity. A transfer is assumed to grow at a rate of interest set by the IRS. Taxpayers hope the property transferred will appreciate in value or earn more income than the assumed interest rate, which is 1.4% in July. Where a GRAT earns income or appreciates in value in excess of 1.4%, the excess is not taxed as part of the gift. If $100 is assumed to grow, at 1.4%, to $102.82 in two years, any increase in value in excess of $102.82 escapes the gift tax calculation. It is easy to understand why Treasury dislikes GRATs; however, the irony is that GRATs are creatures of regulation drafted by Treasury.
If a grantor dies during the initial term, the property in the GRAT is restored to the estate of the grantor. The Treasury proposal would require that GRATs have a minimum term of ten years. The proposal would increase the likelihood of estate taxation of GRATs and minimize the effectiveness of the technique.
A rolling GRAT is a technique whereby the annuity received by the grantor from the GRAT is re-contributed to a new GRAT. Rolling GRATs are designed to reduce the size of one’s estate by not retaining the annuity payments received each year.
In August, the §7520 rate is projected to increase to 2.0% from 1.4% thereby making it a bit more costly to transfer wealth. A Shelf GRAT is created to lock in the use of the lower interest rate for use in future years. The technique requires a more detailed explanation than I can provide here; however, taxpayers planning for the future should act now before Treasury’s proposals are implemented.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!