James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Rolling GRATS and Shelf GRATS: Time To Lock In Low Interest Rates
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: July 25, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
A practitioner commented many years ago that the effectiveness of a tax planning technique can be measured by the strength of government opposition to it. One need only look at the President’s tax plan and the Treasury’s General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2013 Proposals (page 80) to see that Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs) are effective.
A GRAT is a trust to which the Grantor transfers property in exchange for an annuity to be received for a period of time selected by the Grantor. The transfer to the GRAT is reported as a gift at the fair market value of the property reduced by the annuity. A transfer is assumed to grow at a rate of interest set by the IRS. Taxpayers hope the property transferred will appreciate in value or earn more income than the assumed interest rate, which is 1.4% in July. Where a GRAT earns income or appreciates in value in excess of 1.4%, the excess is not taxed as part of the gift. If $100 is assumed to grow, at 1.4%, to $102.82 in two years, any increase in value in excess of $102.82 escapes the gift tax calculation. It is easy to understand why Treasury dislikes GRATs; however, the irony is that GRATs are creatures of regulation drafted by Treasury.
If a grantor dies during the initial term, the property in the GRAT is restored to the estate of the grantor. The Treasury proposal would require that GRATs have a minimum term of ten years. The proposal would increase the likelihood of estate taxation of GRATs and minimize the effectiveness of the technique.
A rolling GRAT is a technique whereby the annuity received by the grantor from the GRAT is re-contributed to a new GRAT. Rolling GRATs are designed to reduce the size of one’s estate by not retaining the annuity payments received each year.
In August, the §7520 rate is projected to increase to 2.0% from 1.4% thereby making it a bit more costly to transfer wealth. A Shelf GRAT is created to lock in the use of the lower interest rate for use in future years. The technique requires a more detailed explanation than I can provide here; however, taxpayers planning for the future should act now before Treasury’s proposals are implemented.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.