
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: June 17, 2016
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comIn recent years, changes in tax laws have affected the way small businesses elect to be taxed. Businesses typically form corporations when transitioning from a sole proprietorship to a larger entity with multiple owners or employees. However, now businesses are more likely to be formed as limited liability companies.
Owners of corporations eligible to elect S status either must make an affirmative election or remain a C corporation. According to Forbes contributor Robert W. Wood, C corporations are the default status of all corporations. Although C corporations are the most common type of corporation in the U.S. according to Incorporate.com, the S corporation status may be more beneficial.
“…the main distinction between the two is that they are taxed very differently.”
Many corporations are C corporations for tax purposes because they fail to satisfy certain technical requirements rendering them ineligible to elect S status. Both S and C corporations are entitled to limited liability protection, are owned by shareholders and are governed by a Board of Directors. Each corporation is designated as a separate legal entity and these concepts are familiar to most business owners. However, the main distinction between the two is that they are taxed very differently.
With an S corporation election, businesses receive the benefits of being taxed on a pass-through basis similar to a partnership or a limited liability company taxed as a partnership. S corporations are not taxed on its income; instead, that income is taxed to the shareholders.
The income of a C corporations is taxed twice – once at the entity level where net income is subject to corporate tax rates and a second time at the shareholder level when dividend distributions are made. An S corporation must make distributions with respect to stock that are in proportion to each shareholder’s ownership percentage. When compared to an S corporation, a partnership or LLC offers more flexibility in structuring different economic, managerial and voting arrangements among the participants.
“…companies converting from C to S could be subject to additional corporate taxes…”
There is a difference between a C corporation and an S corporation with respect to fringe benefits as S corporations are subject to the more restrictive and less generous partnership rules. A company could elect to be a C corporation for a while, then switch its status to that of an S corporation. It is also important to consider that companies converting from C to S could be subject to additional corporate taxes if it sells assets within five years of making theS election. This rule is designed to prevent a switch just prior to sale of the underlying business and it has thwarted many a retirement plan.
Many accountants favor S corporations because one-half of the self-employment taxes are paid by the corporation and dividend distributions escape self-employment tax, provided a reasonable salary is being paid to a shareholder who works for the S corporation. S corporations do not have individual capital accounts for each shareholder which simplifies matters.
The S corporation election may be beneficial for a small business because it allows a company to have up to 100 shareholders in a calendar year. The shareholder rules are also favorable because it allows for U.S. citizens, resident aliens and qualifying trusts, which opens up share ownership to a wide audience. Non-residents are not eligible and not all trusts are eligible to own S stock.
When an S corporation acquires stock of another S corporation (target) it must make a special election to treat the target as a division. C corporations cannot own stock of an S corporation. Provided distributions on stock remain pro rata, S corporations may offer stock with different voting rights. This feature enables small businesses to differentiate voting influence based on share ownership, but it is not as flexible as a limited liability company.
“…the S corporation may be better suited to the needs of small businesses…”
Both the C corporation and S corporation are similar corporate models, and both have their advantages. However, the S corporation may be better suited to the needs of small businesses, specifically because of one level of taxation on operating income and upon sale of the business.
The tax implications cannot be overstated because in the event that the business assets are sold, C corporations are taxed on proceeds of the sale and the shareholders are taxed again on the distribution. As S corporations are only taxed once at the shareholder level on a sale of assets, it is more tax efficient. Although a sale of S or C stock results in only one level of taxation and that is at the shareholder level, buyers are reluctant to purchase stock and assume the liabilities inherent in an existing corporation.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
In recent years, changes in tax laws have affected the way small businesses elect to be taxed. Businesses typically form corporations when transitioning from a sole proprietorship to a larger entity with multiple owners or employees. However, now businesses are more likely to be formed as limited liability companies.
Owners of corporations eligible to elect S status either must make an affirmative election or remain a C corporation. According to Forbes contributor Robert W. Wood, C corporations are the default status of all corporations. Although C corporations are the most common type of corporation in the U.S. according to Incorporate.com, the S corporation status may be more beneficial.
“…the main distinction between the two is that they are taxed very differently.”
Many corporations are C corporations for tax purposes because they fail to satisfy certain technical requirements rendering them ineligible to elect S status. Both S and C corporations are entitled to limited liability protection, are owned by shareholders and are governed by a Board of Directors. Each corporation is designated as a separate legal entity and these concepts are familiar to most business owners. However, the main distinction between the two is that they are taxed very differently.
With an S corporation election, businesses receive the benefits of being taxed on a pass-through basis similar to a partnership or a limited liability company taxed as a partnership. S corporations are not taxed on its income; instead, that income is taxed to the shareholders.
The income of a C corporations is taxed twice – once at the entity level where net income is subject to corporate tax rates and a second time at the shareholder level when dividend distributions are made. An S corporation must make distributions with respect to stock that are in proportion to each shareholder’s ownership percentage. When compared to an S corporation, a partnership or LLC offers more flexibility in structuring different economic, managerial and voting arrangements among the participants.
“…companies converting from C to S could be subject to additional corporate taxes…”
There is a difference between a C corporation and an S corporation with respect to fringe benefits as S corporations are subject to the more restrictive and less generous partnership rules. A company could elect to be a C corporation for a while, then switch its status to that of an S corporation. It is also important to consider that companies converting from C to S could be subject to additional corporate taxes if it sells assets within five years of making theS election. This rule is designed to prevent a switch just prior to sale of the underlying business and it has thwarted many a retirement plan.
Many accountants favor S corporations because one-half of the self-employment taxes are paid by the corporation and dividend distributions escape self-employment tax, provided a reasonable salary is being paid to a shareholder who works for the S corporation. S corporations do not have individual capital accounts for each shareholder which simplifies matters.
The S corporation election may be beneficial for a small business because it allows a company to have up to 100 shareholders in a calendar year. The shareholder rules are also favorable because it allows for U.S. citizens, resident aliens and qualifying trusts, which opens up share ownership to a wide audience. Non-residents are not eligible and not all trusts are eligible to own S stock.
When an S corporation acquires stock of another S corporation (target) it must make a special election to treat the target as a division. C corporations cannot own stock of an S corporation. Provided distributions on stock remain pro rata, S corporations may offer stock with different voting rights. This feature enables small businesses to differentiate voting influence based on share ownership, but it is not as flexible as a limited liability company.
“…the S corporation may be better suited to the needs of small businesses…”
Both the C corporation and S corporation are similar corporate models, and both have their advantages. However, the S corporation may be better suited to the needs of small businesses, specifically because of one level of taxation on operating income and upon sale of the business.
The tax implications cannot be overstated because in the event that the business assets are sold, C corporations are taxed on proceeds of the sale and the shareholders are taxed again on the distribution. As S corporations are only taxed once at the shareholder level on a sale of assets, it is more tax efficient. Although a sale of S or C stock results in only one level of taxation and that is at the shareholder level, buyers are reluctant to purchase stock and assume the liabilities inherent in an existing corporation.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!