Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Scooter Store Seeks Bankruptcy Protection After Federal Raid Uncovers Fraud
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: April 30, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Scooter Store Holdings, a popular company that sells motorized scooters and wheelchairs throughout the U.S., was forced to file for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code after a federal raid proved the company was guilty of fraud.
In March, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Office of the Inspector General, the U.S. Department of Health and the Texas Attorney General’s office raided the company’s Texas headquarters and discovered that thousands of seniors who lacked a medical need for the company’s products had obtained a motorized scooter or wheelchair, in part due to the company’s aggressive harassment of medical clinics to prescribe its products, according to ABC World News.
In addition to the raid, which prompted the company to suspend its operations, the Scooter Store is also facing claims from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The agency is seeking to collect $19.5 million, an amount the company agreed to pay following another investigation that revealed Scooter Store overbilled Medicare and Medicaid by tens of millions of dollars between 2009 and 2011.
“Historical overhangs coupled with an increasingly complex regulatory environment and mounting economic pressure in the health-care sector have significantly impacted the company’s ability to operate under its current model,” said CEO Martin Landon, according to Bloomberg.
The company listed assets between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of between $50 million and $100 million. Following the government raid and its decision to file for bankruptcy protection, the Scooter Store has been forced to reduce its workforce from 2,400 to 300 employees. While the company acknowledges that a series of federal investigations have “imposed significant financial burdens” and damaged its reputation, it said it is fully cooperating with authorities in both criminal and civil lawsuits.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.