The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the application of existing federal securities laws to crypto assets. Most importantly, it reaffirms that the application of federal securities laws to tokenized securities depends not on the use of blockchains or crypto assets, but on the economic and legal substance of the rights conferred.
Categories of Tokenized Securities
As detailed by the SEC, a tokenized security is a financial instrument enumerated in the definition of “security” under the federal securities laws that is formatted as, or represented by, a crypto asset, with ownership records maintained on a crypto network, such as a blockchain or similar distributed ledger technology (DLT). While there are a variety of models used to tokenize securities, and they vary in terms of structure and the rights afforded to holders, tokenized securities generally fall into two categories:
Securities tokenized by or on behalf of the issuers of such securities; and
Securities tokenized by third parties unaffiliated with the issuers of such securities.
Issuer-Sponsored Tokenized Securities
In issuer-sponsored models, the issuer itself (or an affiliated party) tokenizes its securities. These structures may include:
On-chain systems where the blockchain serves as the official record of ownership; or
Hybrid systems where tokens interact with a traditional, off-chain master securityholder file.
These tokens represent the security itself. Accordingly, issuers must comply with applicable Securities Act and Exchange Act requirements, including registration (or exemption), disclosure, reporting, and transfer agent obligations.
Third-party Sponsored Tokenized Securities
In third-party models, an unaffiliated entity tokenizes an existing security or provides tokenized exposure to it. Common structures include:
Custodial models: A third party issues a crypto asset representing an entitlement to an underlying security that the third party holds in custody. The crypto asset evidences the holder’s indirect interest in the underlying security. Transfers are recorded on the third party’s recordkeeping systems, which may be on-chain or off-chain; and
Synthetic or derivative models: A third party issues a crypto asset that provides synthetic exposure to a referenced security, but does not confer rights in the underlying security. These may take the form of linked securities or security-based swaps that are formatted as crypto assets.
Depending on the structure and rights conveyed, these tokens may be treated as securities, security-based swaps, or other regulated financial instruments. Additional regulatory regimes may apply to custodians, broker-dealers, or swap counterparties involved in these arrangements.
Regulatory Implications
The SEC’s latest guidance reinforces that market participants involved in the issuance, trading, custody, or settlement of tokenized securities must assess whether they are required to register or comply with applicable regulatory regimes, including those governing broker-dealers, exchanges, clearing agencies, transfer agents, and investment advisers. Additionally, investor protection provisions—including registration requirements and anti-fraud rules—apply to tokenized securities transactions fully.
By reiterating that tokenized securities fall squarely within existing investor protection frameworks, the SEC underscores that:
Registration and full disclosure are generally required unless a specific exemption applies.
Anti-fraud provisions (e.g., Sections 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933) continue to apply; and
Market intermediaries, including broker-dealers, clearing agencies, custodians, and exchanges, must maintain compliance with relevant regulations regardless of whether ownership is recorded on-chain or off-chain.
How We Can Help
The SEC guidance reaffirms the agency’s consistent regulatory stance that tokenization does not alter the application of federal securities laws. While blockchain technology may offer operational efficiencies, market participants must structure tokenized securities offerings within existing legal and regulatory frameworks. Accordingly, clients exploring tokenization initiatives should engage legal counsel early to evaluate regulatory implications, operational design, and compliance strategies.
Scarinci Hollenbeck represents issuers, intermediaries, in-house counsel, and market participants navigating this emerging area. Our experienced securities attorneys provide comprehensive guidance that allows our clients to capitalize on new opportunities while limiting legal risks.
Zoning Laws Explained: What You Need to Know Before Buying Property
Before buying property, it is critical to determine whether local zoning laws may affect your plans. If you plan to redevelop the property, you will want to confirm that local zoning regulations permit development as intended. If acquiring property that is already developed, you must verify that the use is permitted in the underlying zoning […]
Special Needs Trusts in New Jersey: Planning for Your Loved One’s Future
For parents of a child with a disability, estate planning raises concerns that go well beyond deciding who will inherit their assets. Parents may spend years making sure their child has the right care, services, and support. Eventually, they must also confront a difficult question: Who will take over when they can no longer do […]
What Every Real Estate Investor Should Know Before Buying a Rental Property
Before buying a New Jersey rental property, an investor should verify realistic operating numbers, the property’s legal and regulatory status, lead-based paint and flood compliance, the existing leases and tenant protections, and the right ownership structure. A rental property is more than a piece of real estate; it is an operating business subject to legal, […]
Can You Change an Irrevocable Trust in New Jersey?
In New Jersey, an irrevocable trust can sometimes be modified even though its name suggests otherwise, and one of the primary tools for doing so is a process called decanting. Whether decanting is available depends on the specific terms of the trust and the discretion given to the trustee. Key takeaways: New Jersey has no […]
How Intellectual Property Valuation Will Impact Business Transactions
Intellectual property valuation determines the monetary value of a business’s IP assets, and it drives outcomes in licensing deals, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, financing, and ownership disputes. The most valuable assets of a business are often the things that cannot be seen or touched: a proprietary process, a copyrighted work, brand recognition, or the […]
Data Center, Dark Fiber, and Lit Services Agreements in New Jersey: Key Terms and Legal Pitfalls
For New Jersey data center owners and operators, a service agreement may look routine when it is signed. The network is functioning, the vendor is meeting its installation schedule, and the parties have agreed on pricing and performance specifications. The provisions that seem most important at that stage are often the technical ones. That changes […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
