The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently issued its 2014 Annual Report to Congress on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program.
Per our prior posts, the SEC whistleblower program, which was first launched in 2011, incentivizes the reporting of high-quality, original information that results in an SEC enforcement action with sanctions exceeding $1 million. Whistleblower awards can range from 10 percent to 30 percent of the money collected by the agency.
This year’s report reveals several interesting trends that can help businesses improve their securities compliance strategies. Below is a brief summary:
Whistleblower Tips and Awards Broke Records
While still in its infancy, the SEC’s whistleblower program appears to be going strong. In fiscal year 2014, the SEC issued whistleblower awards to more individuals than in all previous years combined. In addition, the Office of the Whistleblower received 3,620 whistleblower tips in FY 2014, which represents a more than 20 percent increase in the number of whistleblower tips in just two years.
Monetary awards to whistleblowers are also on the rise. On September 22, 2014, the Commission authorized its largest payout to date, an award of more than $30 million to a whistleblower who provided key original information that led to a successful enforcement action. According to the report, the whistleblower, who resides outside of the United States, provided a tip regarding an ongoing fraud that otherwise would have been very difficult to detect.
Businesses Are Missing Opportunities to Resolve Complaints In-House
The SEC report highlights that more than 40 percent of the individuals who received awards were current or former company employees. Of those, most whistleblowers first raised their complaints internally. They ultimately brought the information to the SEC only after the company failed to take corrective action.
For instance, on August 29, 2014, the Office of the Whistleblower announced its first award to a company employee with audit and compliance responsibilities. According to the SEC, the employee reported the securities violation internally and then reported the violation to the SEC after the company failed to take action within 120 days, which is the required waiting period.
Retaliation Is a Growing Compliance Concern
The SEC brought its first enforcement action under the anti-retaliation provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act in FY 2014. The suit against Paradigm Capital Management alleged that the firm engaged in a series of retaliatory actions after learning that its head trader reported prohibited transactions to the SEC. The Commission ordered the firm to pay $2.2 million to settle the case.
In addition, the SEC has taken a very active role in Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation suits brought by whistleblowers. The agency filed amicus curiae briefs in several suits, arguing against a narrow interpretation of the anti-retaliation employment protections established by the Dodd-Frank Act. The SEC maintains that the anti-retaliation protections should not be interpreted to apply only to individuals who make disclosures directly to the Commission.
The SEC Is Monitoring Confidentiality Provisions
The report notes that the Office of the Whistleblower has been “working to identify employee confidentiality, severance, and other kinds of agreements that may interfere with an employee’s ability to report potential wrongdoing to the SEC.” It specifically cites Rule 21F-17(a) under the Exchange Act which says: “[n]o person may take any action to impede an individual from communicating directly with the Commission staff about a possible securities law violation, including enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement…with respect to such communications.” In light of the Financial Industry
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
SEC Whistleblower Program Proceeding Full Steam Ahead
Author: Dan Brecher
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently issued its 2014 Annual Report to Congress on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program.
Per our prior posts, the SEC whistleblower program, which was first launched in 2011, incentivizes the reporting of high-quality, original information that results in an SEC enforcement action with sanctions exceeding $1 million. Whistleblower awards can range from 10 percent to 30 percent of the money collected by the agency.
This year’s report reveals several interesting trends that can help businesses improve their securities compliance strategies. Below is a brief summary:
Whistleblower Tips and Awards Broke Records
While still in its infancy, the SEC’s whistleblower program appears to be going strong. In fiscal year 2014, the SEC issued whistleblower awards to more individuals than in all previous years combined. In addition, the Office of the Whistleblower received 3,620 whistleblower tips in FY 2014, which represents a more than 20 percent increase in the number of whistleblower tips in just two years.
Monetary awards to whistleblowers are also on the rise. On September 22, 2014, the Commission authorized its largest payout to date, an award of more than $30 million to a whistleblower who provided key original information that led to a successful enforcement action. According to the report, the whistleblower, who resides outside of the United States, provided a tip regarding an ongoing fraud that otherwise would have been very difficult to detect.
Businesses Are Missing Opportunities to Resolve Complaints In-House
The SEC report highlights that more than 40 percent of the individuals who received awards were current or former company employees. Of those, most whistleblowers first raised their complaints internally. They ultimately brought the information to the SEC only after the company failed to take corrective action.
For instance, on August 29, 2014, the Office of the Whistleblower announced its first award to a company employee with audit and compliance responsibilities. According to the SEC, the employee reported the securities violation internally and then reported the violation to the SEC after the company failed to take action within 120 days, which is the required waiting period.
Retaliation Is a Growing Compliance Concern
The SEC brought its first enforcement action under the anti-retaliation provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act in FY 2014. The suit against Paradigm Capital Management alleged that the firm engaged in a series of retaliatory actions after learning that its head trader reported prohibited transactions to the SEC. The Commission ordered the firm to pay $2.2 million to settle the case.
In addition, the SEC has taken a very active role in Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation suits brought by whistleblowers. The agency filed amicus curiae briefs in several suits, arguing against a narrow interpretation of the anti-retaliation employment protections established by the Dodd-Frank Act. The SEC maintains that the anti-retaliation protections should not be interpreted to apply only to individuals who make disclosures directly to the Commission.
The SEC Is Monitoring Confidentiality Provisions
The report notes that the Office of the Whistleblower has been “working to identify employee confidentiality, severance, and other kinds of agreements that may interfere with an employee’s ability to report potential wrongdoing to the SEC.” It specifically cites Rule 21F-17(a) under the Exchange Act which says: “[n]o person may take any action to impede an individual from communicating directly with the Commission staff about a possible securities law violation, including enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement…with respect to such communications.” In light of the Financial Industry
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
