
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comPartner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe Supreme Court ruled June 12 that inherited individual retirement accounts, also known as inherited IRAs, are not protected from creditors in bankruptcy proceedings, according to Reuters. As baby boomers die and pass on their assets to their children, this ruling is likely to have wide-reaching effects.
The case before the Supreme Court began in March, and centers around a 2010 bankruptcy, declared by Heidi Heffron-Clark and husband Brandon Clark when their shop closed, the news source explained. The Clarks held approximately $300,000 in an IRA that Heffron-Clark had inherited from her mother nine years prior. They owed roughly $700,000 to their creditors.
Generally, IRAs are protected from creditors in a bankruptcy under the umbrella of protecting debtors’ “essential needs,” according to Reuters. Retirement security is considered to be an essential need, but the trustee administering the Clarks’ estate felt that key differences to an IRA that is inherited meant that it does not fall under the purview of this category.
“Nothing about the inherited IRA’s legal characteristics would prevent (or even discourage) the individual from using the entire balance of the account on a vacation home or sports car immediately after her bankruptcy proceedings are complete,” the ruling said, according to the news source.
The most notable effects of this ruling apply to spouses, Forbes explained. In the event that a spouse dies and leaves an IRA to his or her surviving spouse, that spouse has two options – rolling the IRA into his or her own IRA, or taking that money out. This ruling provides yet another incentive for the surviving spouse to rollover the IRA, because this is the only circumstance in which it would be protected from a potential bankruptcy.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss your company’s creditors’ rights and bankruptcy matters , please contact me, Joel R. Glucksman at ScarinciHollenbeck.com.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Supreme Court ruled June 12 that inherited individual retirement accounts, also known as inherited IRAs, are not protected from creditors in bankruptcy proceedings, according to Reuters. As baby boomers die and pass on their assets to their children, this ruling is likely to have wide-reaching effects.
The case before the Supreme Court began in March, and centers around a 2010 bankruptcy, declared by Heidi Heffron-Clark and husband Brandon Clark when their shop closed, the news source explained. The Clarks held approximately $300,000 in an IRA that Heffron-Clark had inherited from her mother nine years prior. They owed roughly $700,000 to their creditors.
Generally, IRAs are protected from creditors in a bankruptcy under the umbrella of protecting debtors’ “essential needs,” according to Reuters. Retirement security is considered to be an essential need, but the trustee administering the Clarks’ estate felt that key differences to an IRA that is inherited meant that it does not fall under the purview of this category.
“Nothing about the inherited IRA’s legal characteristics would prevent (or even discourage) the individual from using the entire balance of the account on a vacation home or sports car immediately after her bankruptcy proceedings are complete,” the ruling said, according to the news source.
The most notable effects of this ruling apply to spouses, Forbes explained. In the event that a spouse dies and leaves an IRA to his or her surviving spouse, that spouse has two options – rolling the IRA into his or her own IRA, or taking that money out. This ruling provides yet another incentive for the surviving spouse to rollover the IRA, because this is the only circumstance in which it would be protected from a potential bankruptcy.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss your company’s creditors’ rights and bankruptcy matters , please contact me, Joel R. Glucksman at ScarinciHollenbeck.com.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!