Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 18, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to explore whether companies and employees must pay Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) taxes on severance compensation. The results of the ruling could force the U.S. Department of Treasury to pay out roughly $1 billion in tax refund claims.
The case centers around a dispute between bankrupt Quality Stores Inc. and the Internal Revenue Service. The company, which went under in 2001 and closed all 300 of its stores, was forced to lay off 3,100 workers. However, Quality Stores made severance payments to each laid-off worker and paid FICA taxes on the amounts. In 2002, the company claimed a $1.1 million refund with the IRS for the taxes paid, arguing that severance payments do not count as wages, and are therefore not subject to payroll taxes.
Employers and employees each pay 6.2 percent in Social Security taxes on wages, and some of the refund money – if awarded – will go to employees, who allowed the company to lobby for the funds on their behalf. The IRS disagreed with the claims and refused to distribute refunds. “The severance payments at issue here are clearly ‘wages’ for FICA purposes,” the government said in an August filing, according to Reuters. The tax law case is particularly important, as Americans continue to be laid off and may be unsure of their tax obligations when it comes to severance, paid-out PTO days, and bonuses. The IRS currently defines wages broadly to include compensation for services of any type for FICA tax purposes, Bloomberg notes.
Therefore, if the Supreme Court chooses to place restrictions on this law, the Treasury Department may face a barrage of refund claims from companies and employees who previously made FICA payments on severance packages after being laid off.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!