
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comCounsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comThe Securities and Exchange Commission will not be sanctioning cryptocurrency-based exchange-traded funds (cryptocurrency ETFs) anytime soon. According to the agency, there is still too much uncertainty surrounding Bitcoin and other virtual currencies.
Last year, the SEC denied an application to create an ETF tied to the price of Bitcoin. In its decision, the agency cited the lack of regulatory oversight over the digital currency.
Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, who are well-known supporters of Bitcoin, were behind the ETF at issue. Bats BZX Exchange filed a proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust. The ETF would have allowed the public to invest in Bitcoin by purchasing shares in the fund, which would trade on the exchange.
After soliciting public comments on the application, the SEC denied the proposed rule change, concluding that it “does not find the proposal to be consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices and to protect investors and the public interest.”
In a letter to the Investment Company Institute and Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Dalia Blass, director of the SEC’s investment management division, clarified the agency’s position on ETFs linked to cryptocurrencies. According to the SEC, it does not believe that “it is appropriate for fund sponsors to initiate registration of funds that intend to invest substantially in cryptocurrency and related products.” Accordingly, it has asked sponsors that have registration statements filed for such products to withdraw them. As Blass further explained:
Recently, the growth in cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency-related products has attracted significant attention, and we have seen interest among sponsors in offering registered funds that would hold these new digital products,” Bass wrote. “[We stand] ready to engage in dialogue with sponsors regarding the potential development of these funds. We believe, however, that there are a number of significant investor protection issues that need to be examined before sponsors begin offering these funds to retail investors.
The SEC staff letter highlighted a number of concerns, including liquidity, custody, and risk of manipulation. With regard to valuation, the SEC questioned how funds would address when the blockchain for a cryptocurrency diverges into different paths (i.e., a “fork”), which could result in different cryptocurrencies with potentially different prices. In terms of liquidity, the SEC queried how funds would take into account the trading history, price volatility and trading volume of cryptocurrency futures contracts, and whether funds would be able to conduct a meaningful market depth analysis in light of these factors. As for custody concerns, the SEC noted that it is not aware of a custodian currently providing fund custodial services for cryptocurrencies.
“Until the questions identified above can be addressed satisfactorily, we do not believe that it is appropriate for fund sponsors to initiate registration of funds that intend to invest substantially in cryptocurrency and related products, and we have asked sponsors that have registration statements filed for such products to withdraw them,” the SEC said.
The SEC’s latest guidance is not the final nail in the coffin for cryptocurrency ETFs. It just means that they are still off the table at the moment. Until regulations keep up with the popularity of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, they remain extremely high-risk. Businesses considering opportunities involving cryptocurrency should continue to proceed with caution and consult with experienced counsel regarding the potential risks.
The cryptocurrency market also recently took another hit when Facebook announced that it will prohibit advertisements that “promote financial products and services that are frequently associated with misleading or deceptive promotional practices, such as binary options, initial coin offerings and cryptocurrency.” Ads that violate the company’s new policy will be banned on Facebook’s core app, but also in other places where Facebook sells ads, including Instagram and its ad network, Audience Network, which places ads on third-party apps.
As Facebook explained, “We want people to continue to discover and learn about new products and services through Facebook ads without fear of scams or deception. That said, there are many companies who are advertising binary options, ICOs and cryptocurrencies that are not currently operating in good faith.”
The ban applies equally to legitimate businesses. “This policy is intentionally broad while we work to better detect deceptive and misleading advertising practices,” the social media platform stated. “We will revisit this policy and how we enforce it as our signals improve.”
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Securities and Exchange Commission will not be sanctioning cryptocurrency-based exchange-traded funds (cryptocurrency ETFs) anytime soon. According to the agency, there is still too much uncertainty surrounding Bitcoin and other virtual currencies.
Last year, the SEC denied an application to create an ETF tied to the price of Bitcoin. In its decision, the agency cited the lack of regulatory oversight over the digital currency.
Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, who are well-known supporters of Bitcoin, were behind the ETF at issue. Bats BZX Exchange filed a proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust. The ETF would have allowed the public to invest in Bitcoin by purchasing shares in the fund, which would trade on the exchange.
After soliciting public comments on the application, the SEC denied the proposed rule change, concluding that it “does not find the proposal to be consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices and to protect investors and the public interest.”
In a letter to the Investment Company Institute and Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Dalia Blass, director of the SEC’s investment management division, clarified the agency’s position on ETFs linked to cryptocurrencies. According to the SEC, it does not believe that “it is appropriate for fund sponsors to initiate registration of funds that intend to invest substantially in cryptocurrency and related products.” Accordingly, it has asked sponsors that have registration statements filed for such products to withdraw them. As Blass further explained:
Recently, the growth in cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency-related products has attracted significant attention, and we have seen interest among sponsors in offering registered funds that would hold these new digital products,” Bass wrote. “[We stand] ready to engage in dialogue with sponsors regarding the potential development of these funds. We believe, however, that there are a number of significant investor protection issues that need to be examined before sponsors begin offering these funds to retail investors.
The SEC staff letter highlighted a number of concerns, including liquidity, custody, and risk of manipulation. With regard to valuation, the SEC questioned how funds would address when the blockchain for a cryptocurrency diverges into different paths (i.e., a “fork”), which could result in different cryptocurrencies with potentially different prices. In terms of liquidity, the SEC queried how funds would take into account the trading history, price volatility and trading volume of cryptocurrency futures contracts, and whether funds would be able to conduct a meaningful market depth analysis in light of these factors. As for custody concerns, the SEC noted that it is not aware of a custodian currently providing fund custodial services for cryptocurrencies.
“Until the questions identified above can be addressed satisfactorily, we do not believe that it is appropriate for fund sponsors to initiate registration of funds that intend to invest substantially in cryptocurrency and related products, and we have asked sponsors that have registration statements filed for such products to withdraw them,” the SEC said.
The SEC’s latest guidance is not the final nail in the coffin for cryptocurrency ETFs. It just means that they are still off the table at the moment. Until regulations keep up with the popularity of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, they remain extremely high-risk. Businesses considering opportunities involving cryptocurrency should continue to proceed with caution and consult with experienced counsel regarding the potential risks.
The cryptocurrency market also recently took another hit when Facebook announced that it will prohibit advertisements that “promote financial products and services that are frequently associated with misleading or deceptive promotional practices, such as binary options, initial coin offerings and cryptocurrency.” Ads that violate the company’s new policy will be banned on Facebook’s core app, but also in other places where Facebook sells ads, including Instagram and its ad network, Audience Network, which places ads on third-party apps.
As Facebook explained, “We want people to continue to discover and learn about new products and services through Facebook ads without fear of scams or deception. That said, there are many companies who are advertising binary options, ICOs and cryptocurrencies that are not currently operating in good faith.”
The ban applies equally to legitimate businesses. “This policy is intentionally broad while we work to better detect deceptive and misleading advertising practices,” the social media platform stated. “We will revisit this policy and how we enforce it as our signals improve.”
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!