
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.com
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comToday, an increasing number of children are born with assistance of advanced reproductive technology. Such children may be conceived and born years after the death of a parent. This miracle of science poses difficulties for trustees administering existing trusts and lawyers drafting new trusts.
A typical trust has a current beneficiary who receives distributions of income and principal. The issue of the current beneficiary (child) will receive the distributions upon the child’s death. If there are no issues, the interest may pass to the child’s siblings or the issue of the siblings. What happens if a child of assisted reproduction is born years after the death of the current beneficiary?
Children of assisted reproduction may result from various combinations of sperm source, egg source, birth mother and parental relationship. A common example is the posthumous child conceived by the wife using the sperm of her deceased husband. Few would argue that the child is a child of the mother. Some may question if the donor consented to a posthumous child; however, most observers would infer consent from the deposit of sperm in a clinic prior to death. How does one evaluate consent where the extraction of sperm occurs after death of the donor?
How does a trustee evaluate the circumstances of a childless couple that uses reproductive technology to conceive a child. If the sperm and egg are from the husband and wife and in vitro fertilization occurs, one would expect the child would be a child of these parents. What if the sperm, the egg or both were donated by third parties? Clearly, the intent of the husband and wife to treat the child as their own should control. What if the husband did not want a child and the wife is impregnated with the sperm of an unrelated donor? Should the trustee recognize the child if the wife is an in-law or should the trustee assume the child is of the marriage?
To properly administer a trust, the class of persons who will succeed to the income and principal distributions must be determined. In trust parlance, the class of beneficiaries must close. If assisted reproduction can occur years after the death of the child, it may be difficult to close the class and effectively administer the trust.
Most parents and grandparents would include an adopted child as part of the class of beneficiaries. Parents and grandparents should ask themselves whether they intend to limit successors to issue having genetic material from blood-relatives. The treatment of same-sex couples should also be considered as it is possible that one or more of these relationships may be encountered in the future. Finally, if there is to be a further division into shares upon the death of a beneficiary, how long must a trustee wait until closing the class of beneficiaries.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher

For many New Jersey businesses, growth is a primary objective for the New Year. However, it is important to recognize that growth involves both opportunity and risk. For example, business expansion often results in complex contracts, an increased workforce, new regulatory requirements, and heightened exposure to disputes. Without proactive planning, even routine growth can lead […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Crypto investor protection continues to evolve, with the SEC and CFTC investing resources and coordinating more closely to uphold regulatory standards. Whether you’re a retail investor, an institutional trader, or part of a crypto startup, understanding enforcement trends is essential for navigating this dynamic and high-stakes regulatory environment. Crypto Is No Longer the Wild West […]
Author: Dan Brecher

A Settled Regulatory Environment Enables Confident Capital Planning New Jersey’s new manufacturing incentive program, Next New Jersey Manufacturing Program, enters 2026 with something uncommon in economic development these days: policy stability. The statute is enacted, New Jersey Economic Development Authority’s (“NJEDA”) rules are adopted, and the application portal is open. With the election outcome settled, […]
Author: Michael J. Sheppeard
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!