Robinhood Markets, a free, online stock trading platform, is under scrutiny for its role in the recent market volatility involving stocks such as GameStop Corp. and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc...
Robinhood Markets, a free, online stock trading platform, is under scrutiny for its role in the recent market volatility involving stocks such as GameStop Corp. and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. The company has been hit with lawsuits and potential regulatory enforcement after it halted trading in 11 stocks after their stock prices skyrocketed.
If you have been following the news, you are likely aware that a group of everyday investors recently united on social media to send GameStop’s stock price soaring to astronomical levels, climbing a staggering 1600 percent in the month of January. The high trading volume caused significant losses for hedge funds and other firms that bet the stock price of the struggling company would continue to fall. The market volatility rattled Wall Street and ultimately caused Robinhood to temporarily halt trading. The platform’s users were furious that they were shutout from buying the hot stocks and capitalizing on potential gains, while hedge funds continued to buy and sell shares.
Robinhood Defends Actions
While many have speculated that Robinhood restricted trading in GameStop to protect its hedge funds partners, the company maintains that it was actually protecting its own interests. On January 28, 2021, Robinhood released a statement on its blog and social media. The company defended its decision to restrict trading, citing its regulatory obligations. It wrote:
Amid this week’s extraordinary circumstances in the market, we made a tough decision today to temporarily limit buying for certain securities. As a brokerage firm, we have many financial requirements, including SEC net capital obligations and clearinghouse deposits. Some of these requirements fluctuate based on volatility in the markets and can be substantial in the current environment. These requirements exist to protect investors and the markets and we take our responsibilities to comply with them seriously, including through the measures we have taken today.
SEC Statement on Market Volatility
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also released a statement, although it did not mention any of the entities by name. Instead, the SEC stated that it was “evaluating the extreme price volatility of certain stocks’ trading prices over the past several days,” noting that it “has the potential to expose investors to rapid and severe losses and undermine market confidence.”
SEC Acting Chair Allison Herren Lee further stated that the agency is working closely with its regulatory partners, including FINRA and the stock exchanges, to “ensure that regulated entities uphold their obligations to protect investors and to identify and pursue potential wrongdoing.” She added:
The Commission will closely review actions taken by regulated entities that may disadvantage investors or otherwise unduly inhibit their ability to trade certain securities. In addition, we will act to protect retail investors when the facts demonstrate abusive or manipulative trading activity that is prohibited by the federal securities laws. Market participants should be careful to avoid such activity. Likewise, issuers must ensure compliance with the federal securities laws for any contemplated offers or sales of their own securities.
Congress Scrutinizing Robinhood for Conflicts of Interest
Members of Congress on both sides of the aisle have called for investigations into Robinhood’s handling of the recent trading turmoil. “The public deserves a clear accounting of Robinhood’s relationships with large financial firms and the extent to which those relationships may be undermining its obligations to its customers,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in the letter to Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev.
In her letter, which copied the SEC and FINRA, Sen. Warren asked Robinhood to describe its relationship with Citadel Securities, a hedge fund that serves as a market maker for Robinhood. Warren also wants to know whether the trading platform held any talks with Citadel Securities (or its affiliates) before deciding to restrict purchases of GameStop. Warren also asked Robinhood to provide information regarding what user data it shares with Citadel Securities and how much money it makes from the relationship.
The House Financial Services Committee has also called Tenev to testify at a hearing on the recent market volatility. The hearing is scheduled for February 18, 2021.
Key Takeaway
At this point, it is still unclear if Robinhood will face legal liability for violating securities regulations and/or consumer protection laws. It will likely come down to whether the company placed the interests of its corporate partners ahead of its users. To defend its actions, the startup will likely have to provide further details regarding the decision-making process that precipitated halting GameStop trades and disclose the nature of its relationship with Citadel Securities and other financial backers. Robinhood must also take steps to rehabilitate its reputation as a platform for the “little guy” to participate in the stock market.
If you have questions, please contact us
We will monitor developments involving this situation and provide future updates or alerts. If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss these issues further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at (201) 896-4100.
Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs
When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments
New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy
A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Utility-Scale Battery Storage Projects: A Legal Roadmap for Developers, Property Owners and Other Stakeholders
Utility-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) are becoming an increasingly important component of the electric grid throughout New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. As renewable generation expands, electricity demand increases and grid operators seek greater flexibility, battery storage can help balance supply and demand while providing additional capacity and reliability. For developers, battery storage presents […]
Navigating Disputes: Hire a Partnership Dispute Lawyer
A falling out between partners can be disastrous for any business. In many cases, the partnership will not survive. If you are in an unworkable situation with your partners, it may be time to consult a partnership dispute lawyer experienced in handling partnership breakups and dissolutions before the situation deteriorates any further. It is easy […]
Section 363 Sales in Bankruptcy: What Businesses, Lenders, and Buyers Need to Know
When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
