
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 9, 2014
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comTrump Entertainment, the one-time casino enterprise formerly-owned by the millionaire who begrudgingly shares its name, encountered yet another setback in court Oct. 3.
According to The Wall Street Journal, the company lost a bid to immediately stop payments into a pension fund for its 1,135 unionized employees at the Trump Taj Mahal. Trump Entertainment sought emergency relief from these payments, suggesting that they posed a threat to its ability to restructure. The casino company – which now owns only the Trump Taj Mahal – filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law in September.
Trump Entertainment’s argument was rejected by Judge Kevin Gross, who noted that a debate regarding the company’s contract with Unite Here Local 54 would occur on Oct. 14 and that pension funding would be included in talks then, the news source reported. Until that point, the organizations are required to continue negotiating.
Gross also said that the U.S. Bankruptcy Code prevented him from allowing Trump to permanently reject a portion of its collective bargaining agreement with Unite Here Local 54, according to Reuters. However, while this decision provides some temporary relief, it appears that it would be possible for him to allow Trump Entertainment to reject the agreement as a whole, depriving employees of health benefits as well as pension payments. For its side, Trump Entertainment has said that ending pension payments would save it about $3.7 million annually.
On Oct. 2, a pension fund lawyer said that Trump Entertainment was using this trip through bankruptcy to clean up its business before delivering it to Carl Icahn, the company’s main creditor, the news source reported.
As a tax attorney at Scarinci Hollenbeck LCC, a general practice law firm in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan area, I’ve followed Trump Entertainment’s bouts with bankruptcy, check out my previous posts here:
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Trump Entertainment, the one-time casino enterprise formerly-owned by the millionaire who begrudgingly shares its name, encountered yet another setback in court Oct. 3.
According to The Wall Street Journal, the company lost a bid to immediately stop payments into a pension fund for its 1,135 unionized employees at the Trump Taj Mahal. Trump Entertainment sought emergency relief from these payments, suggesting that they posed a threat to its ability to restructure. The casino company – which now owns only the Trump Taj Mahal – filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law in September.
Trump Entertainment’s argument was rejected by Judge Kevin Gross, who noted that a debate regarding the company’s contract with Unite Here Local 54 would occur on Oct. 14 and that pension funding would be included in talks then, the news source reported. Until that point, the organizations are required to continue negotiating.
Gross also said that the U.S. Bankruptcy Code prevented him from allowing Trump to permanently reject a portion of its collective bargaining agreement with Unite Here Local 54, according to Reuters. However, while this decision provides some temporary relief, it appears that it would be possible for him to allow Trump Entertainment to reject the agreement as a whole, depriving employees of health benefits as well as pension payments. For its side, Trump Entertainment has said that ending pension payments would save it about $3.7 million annually.
On Oct. 2, a pension fund lawyer said that Trump Entertainment was using this trip through bankruptcy to clean up its business before delivering it to Carl Icahn, the company’s main creditor, the news source reported.
As a tax attorney at Scarinci Hollenbeck LCC, a general practice law firm in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan area, I’ve followed Trump Entertainment’s bouts with bankruptcy, check out my previous posts here:
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!