Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 20, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comTwitter recently forged a unique agreement with San Francisco, whereby the company would keep its headquarters in the city in exchange for lucrative payroll tax breaks. Currently, San Francisco is the only city in California that collects payroll taxes, according to the San Francisco Gate. An analysis conducted by certified public accountant Jim McHale – in collaboration with the Chronicle – revealed that San Francisco stands to lose roughly $34 million in revenue from stock grants alone that may be exercised and sold after the company’s IPO.

Currently, the rising stock indicates that this scenario may become a reality, an ABC News report found.
“About 82 million shares of Twitter have exchanged hands already,” the news source noted. “To put that in perspective, Twitter only sold 70 million shares in its IPO. One way to think about it, every share issued in Twitter’s IPO has been traded more than once, and the session isn’t half over yet.”
Additionally, the city noted that that payroll tax law agreement struck with Twitter may cost them about $22 million over a six-year period without the IPO – or $56 million overall – leaving many analysts to wonder how revenue streams will be affected over the next several years.
Despite the potential losses, the San Francisco claims that it would have forfeited more revenue in the long run if the company had decided to relocate its headquarters to Palo Alto, Calif. Although the city stands to gain from keeping the company in its cross hairs, not all are on board with the deal.
“As technology companies like Twitter and Facebook seek to turn ideas into profits by going public and selling stock, they are also exploiting taxpayer subsidies for executive pay to avoid paying any taxes on billions of dollars of earnings,” Think Progress columnist Alan Pyke wrote.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!