Twitter’s initial public offering has been a boon for investors, but a tax deal agreement the company negotiated with San Francisco may end up costing the city millions of dollars in the future.
Twitter recently forged a unique agreement with San Francisco, whereby the company would keep its headquarters in the city in exchange for lucrative payroll tax breaks. Currently, San Francisco is the only city in California that collects payroll taxes, according to the San Francisco Gate. An analysis conducted by certified public accountant Jim McHale – in collaboration with the Chronicle – revealed that San Francisco stands to lose roughly $34 million in revenue from stock grants alone that may be exercised and sold after the company’s IPO.
Currently, the rising stock indicates that this scenario may become a reality, an ABC News report found.
“About 82 million shares of Twitter have exchanged hands already,” the news source noted. “To put that in perspective, Twitter only sold 70 million shares in its IPO. One way to think about it, every share issued in Twitter’s IPO has been traded more than once, and the session isn’t half over yet.”
Additionally, the city noted that that payroll tax law agreement struck with Twitter may cost them about $22 million over a six-year period without the IPO – or $56 million overall – leaving many analysts to wonder how revenue streams will be affected over the next several years.
Despite the potential losses, the San Francisco claims that it would have forfeited more revenue in the long run if the company had decided to relocate its headquarters to Palo Alto, Calif. Although the city stands to gain from keeping the company in its cross hairs, not all are on board with the deal.
“As technology companies like Twitter and Facebook seek to turn ideas into profits by going public and selling stock, they are also exploiting taxpayer subsidies for executive pay to avoid paying any taxes on billions of dollars of earnings,” Think Progress columnist Alan Pyke wrote.
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
