Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 28, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFalling in line with the push for greater global collaboration to combat tax evasion, the United States and the Cayman Islands have reached a tax deal to fight violations.
The partnership – which is partially designed to encourage other low-tax and favorable tax havens to join the U.S’s anti-tax evasion legislation – means that the highly-scrutinized Cayman Islands will participate in the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act set to take effect in July 2014. More specifically, the agreement “will provide certainty to Cayman’s significant fund industry with respect to FATCA implementation,” said Robert Stack, the U.S. Treasury Department’s deputy assistant secretary for international tax affairs, according to Reuters.
The deal is a large win for the U.S.’s battle against tax evasion, as the small Caribbean destination currently has no income tax and is therefore a popular location for individuals with large investment holdings. Once the agreement between the U.S. and the Cayman Islands is signed, the latter will be required to disclose account information on all U.S. clients who hold more than $50,000 in assets in the small island. However, these thresholds may be higher for those who are married and filing jointly, the IRS noted. Failure to comply with the new tax law could result in a 30 percent withholding tax on U.S. source income, and may result in countries essentially being pushed out of U.S. markets.
The threat of these penalties may play a role in encouraging other small islands and countries who have not yet signed agreements with the U.S. to either do so, or risk being alienated from lucrative U.S. financial markets. For example, Bermuda and the British Virgin Islands have yet to forge an agreement with the U.S., and may face difficulties competing for investment funds with other countries that have entered into an international partnership, Reuters explained.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!