
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: July 29, 2013

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThe gift tax law is a popular strategy used by individuals and business owners of all income levels to reduce their taxable estate and pass on wealth, property, and assets to future generations. While most people may know the basics of the gift tax law, many may not be aware of the fine details that may impact their tax and estate planning decisions.
In a recent Wall Street Journal column, an individual wrote in expressing confusion over the limitations and exclusions associated with the gift tax law. One of the most common misperceptions about the rule is that the gift tax exclusion only applies when gifts are passed down to children or spouses. In actuality, the Internal Revenue Service allows a person to extend gifts of up to $14,000 to whomever they wish in 2013. This number doubles to $28,000 for married couples filing jointly. This means that a person or couple may extend gifts up to that limit to children, siblings, neighbors, friends, parents, or even strangers without facing tax liabilities. Further, individuals may give these gifts up to as many people as they wish. Typically, gifts given between spouses are tax-free.
In addition, there are a number of gifts that are excluded from the annual limit. For instance, a person may pay for the medical expenses or school tuition of anyone they wish without coming under the limitations of the gift tax law. This means that parents who pay for the tuition of their children – even if the amount exceeds $28,000 – will not be required to pay taxes on any funds that exceed the annual threshold.
Understanding these details can help parents, business owners and individuals make more informed decisions about how to extend financing or gifts to loved ones and help ensure that they don’t face any tax surprises in the future.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!