There is a difficult and uneasy relationship between the Federal Income Tax (FIT) and the New Jersey Gross Income Tax (NJGIT). Despite the fact that the income for FIT purposes is the starting point for NJGIT purposes, there are significant differences. One observation is that NJGIT is unfriendly when it comes to the types of deductions allowed, the ability to carry losses to other years, and offsetting income and losses from different categories.
In Warsalv.Director, the differences between a FIT non-business bad-debt loss and NJGIT treatment is readily apparent. Although NJGIT permits some losses to be recognized, it does not provide for federal treatment to carryover to New Jersey in every case. The issue was whether the bad debt owed by a family member was a sale or disposition for NJGIT purposes. The court held that it was not and therefore was not deductible. Although the debt was deductible for federal purposes as a non-business bad debt that theory was not recognized for NJGIT. The taxpayer advanced the theory that the debtor’s non-payment constituted a “disposition” under state law which permitted the taxpayer to recognize gain or loss.
A second issue was whether the federal treatment of the bad debt constituted a “method of accounting” that the state must follow for NJGIT purposes. The court stated that it was not a method of accounting to be imported into state law.
A second issue involves losses from S corporations. State Tax Bulletin GIT – 9S provides that: In no case can you adjust your New Jersey adjusted basis in the stock below zero. S corporation losses which you are unable to use for New Jersey gross income tax purposes to offset income from another S corporation in the year the losses are incurred may not be used to offset S corporation income in any other taxable year. However, such unused losses will be used to adjust your New Jersey adjusted basis when calculating your gain/loss from the disposition of your shares of the S corporation
N.J.S.A.54A:5-2 only permits losses to offset income of the same class incurred in the same year. The state required taxpayers to reduce their state basis even when they were unable to use the losses and such a view prevailed until the a defeat in court.
In the aftermath of 2008, many businesses generated losses. Unfortunately, the losses from prior years were of no help for NJGIT purposes when the major asset was sold. One taxpayer recognized gain for NJGIT paid state income tax but did not for FIT. In net economic terms, the taxpayer lost money even with the proceeds of sale. Planning is imperative.
New Jersey and taxpayers are not perfect together.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Uneasy Link Between Federal Income Tax And NJ Gross Income Tax
Author: James F. McDonough
There is a difficult and uneasy relationship between the Federal Income Tax (FIT) and the New Jersey Gross Income Tax (NJGIT). Despite the fact that the income for FIT purposes is the starting point for NJGIT purposes, there are significant differences. One observation is that NJGIT is unfriendly when it comes to the types of deductions allowed, the ability to carry losses to other years, and offsetting income and losses from different categories.
In Warsalv.Director, the differences between a FIT non-business bad-debt loss and NJGIT treatment is readily apparent. Although NJGIT permits some losses to be recognized, it does not provide for federal treatment to carryover to New Jersey in every case. The issue was whether the bad debt owed by a family member was a sale or disposition for NJGIT purposes. The court held that it was not and therefore was not deductible. Although the debt was deductible for federal purposes as a non-business bad debt that theory was not recognized for NJGIT. The taxpayer advanced the theory that the debtor’s non-payment constituted a “disposition” under state law which permitted the taxpayer to recognize gain or loss.
A second issue was whether the federal treatment of the bad debt constituted a “method of accounting” that the state must follow for NJGIT purposes. The court stated that it was not a method of accounting to be imported into state law.
A second issue involves losses from S corporations. State Tax Bulletin GIT – 9S provides that: In no case can you adjust your New Jersey adjusted basis in the stock below zero. S corporation losses which you are unable to use for New Jersey gross income tax purposes to offset income from another S corporation in the year the losses are incurred may not be used to offset S corporation income in any other taxable year. However, such unused losses will be used to adjust your New Jersey adjusted basis when calculating your gain/loss from the disposition of your shares of the S corporation
N.J.S.A.54A:5-2 only permits losses to offset income of the same class incurred in the same year. The state required taxpayers to reduce their state basis even when they were unable to use the losses and such a view prevailed until the a defeat in court.
In the aftermath of 2008, many businesses generated losses. Unfortunately, the losses from prior years were of no help for NJGIT purposes when the major asset was sold. One taxpayer recognized gain for NJGIT paid state income tax but did not for FIT. In net economic terms, the taxpayer lost money even with the proceeds of sale. Planning is imperative.
New Jersey and taxpayers are not perfect together.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
