Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Can Your Company Benefit from the USPTO’s Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program?

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: July 15, 2020

Key Contacts

Back

The USPTO’s latest program, the “Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program,” seeks to speed up the resolution of ex parte appeals. 

Can Your Company Benefit from the USPTO’s Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program?

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) continues to roll out new pilot programs. Its latest, the “Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program,” seeks to speed up the resolution of ex parte appeals. 

The Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program took effect on July 2, 2020. Under the program, an appellant who has filed an ex parte appeal before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and received a notice that the appeal has been docketed may file a petition, accompanied by a petition fee, to expedite the review of his or her appeal. According to the USPTO, it expects that the average ex parte appeal reviewed under the new pilot program will be decided within six months from the date a petition is granted. Currently, the average appeal pendency is about 15 months. 

“The Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program serves as an extension of the Track One prioritized examination program, which has proven to be very popular with our nation’s innovators,” Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO, said in a press statement. “For the first time in USPTO history, applicants will be able to speed up both patent examination and ex parte appeals, thus obtaining decisions on their most important inventions in about half the time of a typical application.”

Eligibility for Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program

As set forth in the Federal Register Notice, the following four conditions must be met to qualify for fast-track status:

  • Application type: The application must be an original utility, design, or plant nonprovisional application.
  • Status of appeal: The appeal for fast-track status must be an ex parte appeal for which a notice of appeal has been filed and a PTAB docketing notice has been issued by the USPTO (i.e., the appeal is pending before the PTAB).
  • Petition: The appellant must file a petition via the USPTO’s electronic filing system identifying the application and appeal by application number and appeal number, respectively, for which fast-track review is sought. The following form is required: Petition—Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program (Form PTO/SB/451)
  • Fee: The appellant must pay a $400 fee with the petition.

Fast-Track Appeal Process

A petition may be filed anytime between (1) the date when the PTAB issues a notice that the appeal has been docketed to the PTAB, and (2) the date at which a final decision is rendered by the PTAB, or PTAB jurisdiction otherwise ends. Petitions for fast-track status may be filed for ex parte appeals regardless of whether the appeal is newly docketed or was docketed previously. If the petition complies with the formal requirements (e.g., signature, identification of application) and is accompanied by the required fee, the appeal will be given fast-track status in accordance with current procedures.

An appellant may not reschedule the date or time of a hearing and remain in the Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program. If an appellant in an ex parte appeal accorded fast-track status must reschedule the date or time of a hearing and is not willing to waive the oral hearing, then the appellant may opt out of the Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program, thereby regaining the ability to reschedule or relocate the hearing as per ordinary PTAB hearing procedures. In such cases, the appellant will not be entitled to a refund of the petition fee.

What’s Next?

Petitions to request inclusion of an ex parte appeal in the pilot program will be accepted until 500 appeals have been accorded fast-track status under the program, or until July 2, 2021, whichever occurs earlier. According to the USPTO, it will evaluate the Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program at the conclusion of this period or to determine if it should be made permanent. 

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs post image

Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs

When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs"
New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments post image

New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments

New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]

Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

Link to post with title - "New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments"
“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy post image

“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy

A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy"
Utility-Scale Battery Storage Projects: A Legal Roadmap for Developers, Property Owners and Other Stakeholders post image

Utility-Scale Battery Storage Projects: A Legal Roadmap for Developers, Property Owners and Other Stakeholders

Utility-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) are becoming an increasingly important component of the electric grid throughout New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. As renewable generation expands, electricity demand increases and grid operators seek greater flexibility, battery storage can help balance supply and demand while providing additional capacity and reliability. For developers, battery storage presents […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "Utility-Scale Battery Storage Projects: A Legal Roadmap for Developers, Property Owners and Other Stakeholders"
Navigating Disputes: Hire a Partnership Dispute Lawyer post image

Navigating Disputes: Hire a Partnership Dispute Lawyer

A falling out between partners can be disastrous for any business. In many cases, the partnership will not survive. If you are in an unworkable situation with your partners, it may be time to consult a partnership dispute lawyer experienced in handling partnership breakups and dissolutions before the situation deteriorates any further. It is easy […]

Author: Jay McDaniel

Link to post with title - "Navigating Disputes: Hire a Partnership Dispute Lawyer"
Section 363 Sales in Bankruptcy: What Businesses, Lenders, and Buyers Need to Know post image

Section 363 Sales in Bankruptcy: What Businesses, Lenders, and Buyers Need to Know

When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell […]

Author: John D. Giampolo

Link to post with title - "Section 363 Sales in Bankruptcy: What Businesses, Lenders, and Buyers Need to Know"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!