The USPTO and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) joined the rest of us in attempting to improve with a New Year’s resolution. However, instead of already giving up on gym membership plans, the USPTO has taken 2017 by storm with an emphasis on digital efficiency, some rule changes, and everyone’s favorite, increased fees.
Glossy shiny glass icon on white background
Whether you are a seasoned practitioner, or an individual navigating the trademark thickets yourself, you should bookmark this page for reference now that January 14, 2017, rule changes are in effect.
Efficiency
It’s not very often that one hears the words “efficient” and “government” uttered in the same breath. But come January 14, we should have fewer action items when dealing with the USPTO and TTAB in general.
Thanks to the USPTO’s 2017 resolution to save the environment, or in the alternative, settle a grudge with the paper industry:
E-Filing is no longer preferred, but expected and mandatory with the TTAB.
This requirement appears to only be waivable via petitioning the office.
This includes correspondence between the parties (i.e., say goodbye to the 5-day snail mail grace period and hello to composing, even more, e-mails).
The TTAB is taking service requirements off our plates.
This thankfully relieves us of cancellation and opposition service duties for initial pleadings, replacing first-class mail with a link embedded in an e-mail sent to other parties to the matter.
This is also an opportunity to make sure that all of the contact information you may be responsible for is up-to-date.
You and/or your clients get to give the government more money!
A total of 10 TTAB-related fees will be adjusted. Six fees for initiating a proceeding will increase, depending upon whether filed electronically or on paper.
After an initial request for extension, there are now four new fees established for electronic and paper-filed requests to further extend time to file a notice of opposition.
There are fees for extensions of time to oppose billed per application rather than per class.
Moreover, the per-class fee for an initial application for registration filed on paper is going from $375 to $600 per mark, per class (supporting anti-paper conspiracy theorists).
A full list of fee changes is provided here by the USPTO.
Testimony
Relevant to a smaller segment of readers but important nonetheless, there has been some tweaking to evidentiary procedure. One huge takeaway in this department is that witness testimony can now be submitted by affidavit alone. The hassles of live depositions should subside, however:
Live depositions are still an available cross-examination tool for opposing parties in examining a witness affidavit;
Notices of reliance have had their capacity expanded to record registrations and introduce supporting digital content;
Of concern is that the efficiency seemingly sought after by the USPTO may be undermined by overwhelming amounts of evidence likely to now be submitted, delaying proceeding considerably.
Discovery
Gone are the days of unlimited requests. We now have the number “75” restraining our decision making when it comes time to talk document production and admission strategy, and further (likely in the name of efficiency), the discovery period is now a bright line six-month ordeal.
With the digitalization and constant technological progress of society, new and interesting trademark requests will continue to appear and challenge existing definitions and requirements. We at W. R. Samuels Law will continue to keep our ears pressed to the ground in order to detect new trends in trademark law before they have an impact on our clients. For more information, contact us.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The USPTO Made a New Years' Resolution & It Impacts You
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The USPTO and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) joined the rest of us in attempting to improve with a New Year’s resolution. However, instead of already giving up on gym membership plans, the USPTO has taken 2017 by storm with an emphasis on digital efficiency, some rule changes, and everyone’s favorite, increased fees.
Glossy shiny glass icon on white background
Whether you are a seasoned practitioner, or an individual navigating the trademark thickets yourself, you should bookmark this page for reference now that January 14, 2017, rule changes are in effect.
Efficiency
It’s not very often that one hears the words “efficient” and “government” uttered in the same breath. But come January 14, we should have fewer action items when dealing with the USPTO and TTAB in general.
Thanks to the USPTO’s 2017 resolution to save the environment, or in the alternative, settle a grudge with the paper industry:
E-Filing is no longer preferred, but expected and mandatory with the TTAB.
This requirement appears to only be waivable via petitioning the office.
This includes correspondence between the parties (i.e., say goodbye to the 5-day snail mail grace period and hello to composing, even more, e-mails).
The TTAB is taking service requirements off our plates.
This thankfully relieves us of cancellation and opposition service duties for initial pleadings, replacing first-class mail with a link embedded in an e-mail sent to other parties to the matter.
This is also an opportunity to make sure that all of the contact information you may be responsible for is up-to-date.
You and/or your clients get to give the government more money!
A total of 10 TTAB-related fees will be adjusted. Six fees for initiating a proceeding will increase, depending upon whether filed electronically or on paper.
After an initial request for extension, there are now four new fees established for electronic and paper-filed requests to further extend time to file a notice of opposition.
There are fees for extensions of time to oppose billed per application rather than per class.
Moreover, the per-class fee for an initial application for registration filed on paper is going from $375 to $600 per mark, per class (supporting anti-paper conspiracy theorists).
A full list of fee changes is provided here by the USPTO.
Testimony
Relevant to a smaller segment of readers but important nonetheless, there has been some tweaking to evidentiary procedure. One huge takeaway in this department is that witness testimony can now be submitted by affidavit alone. The hassles of live depositions should subside, however:
Live depositions are still an available cross-examination tool for opposing parties in examining a witness affidavit;
Notices of reliance have had their capacity expanded to record registrations and introduce supporting digital content;
Of concern is that the efficiency seemingly sought after by the USPTO may be undermined by overwhelming amounts of evidence likely to now be submitted, delaying proceeding considerably.
Discovery
Gone are the days of unlimited requests. We now have the number “75” restraining our decision making when it comes time to talk document production and admission strategy, and further (likely in the name of efficiency), the discovery period is now a bright line six-month ordeal.
With the digitalization and constant technological progress of society, new and interesting trademark requests will continue to appear and challenge existing definitions and requirements. We at W. R. Samuels Law will continue to keep our ears pressed to the ground in order to detect new trends in trademark law before they have an impact on our clients. For more information, contact us.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
