
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: July 23, 2013

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comTrusts and estates are now subject to the new 3.8% tax on Net Investment Income (NII) in excess of an income threshold of $11,950 in 2013. NII includes interest, dividends, rents, royalties or income from a trade or business that is a passive activity under IRC §469 (Passive Loss Rules). A trust can avoid the 3.8% tax by distributing NII, in other words, becoming a “Special Trustee”. The threshold is called Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) and is equal to $11,950 for trusts, $250,000 for a married couple and $125,000 for a single filer. (MAGI may be subject to other adjustments that are not covered here.) The 3.8% tax may be avoided if MAGI of the recipient beneficiaries is below the MAGI threshold applicable to their filing status.
Where a profitable business is held in trust and the beneficiary has other substantial income, distribution of income from the Trust may not avoid the 3.8% tax. One should also note that trust may not have been intended to provide the beneficiaries with substantial distributions. The grantor of the trust may have intended that income be accumulated rather than distributed. The income could be accumulated for future needs or a nest egg. It may be accumulated in order to encourage the beneficiary to become self-reliant and a productive member of society. In either case, avoiding the 3.8% tax is important.
Interest, dividends, royalties and rents may be excluded from the definition of NII if they are derived in the ordinary course of a trade or business. Having a trade or business makes the income active and avoids the 3.8% tax on passive income. How does a trust owning stock in an S corporation that operates a business qualify for this exception? How does a limited liability company that owns a shopping center qualify where it provides substantial services?
The IRS takes (and litigates) the position that only the direct actions of the trustee may be considered in determining whether a trust materially participates in the business thereby converting income from passive subject to 3.8% tax to active income and avoiding this tax. Some states permit a trustee to delegate authority to agents (e.g. Estate of Carter in Texas) while other states permit the use of special trustees whose sole function is to operate the business.
Now is the time to review trusts and the income earned. States that permit the use of special trustees and self-directed trusts are closer to solving the problem.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!