James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Will Stepping-Up The Basis of Assets Become More Important Than Avoiding Estate Tax?
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: August 25, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Trends come and go and taxation is no different. The change in 2001 to raise the estate tax exemption, now $5,340,000, and to lower the top estate tax rate, now 40%, shifted the emphasis in estate tax planning. The combined estates of most American couples will remain below $10,680,000, so estate tax is no longer a factor for these taxpayers. Recent changes in individual tax rates has caused another shift. Individual tax rates for capital gains were 15% rate in 2001; however, today capital gains are now taxed at 23.8% before state income taxes are considered. Although it is easier to avoid estate tax with the higher exemption, the heirs may lose 8% more on a sale of the asset. Planning for the multiple generations requires consideration of stepping up the basis of assets.
The plan, for individuals who do not reside in New Jersey and whose state death tax law tracks the federal exemption, is to hold assets until death and step-up their basis. In New Jersey, this strategy attracts a state death tax because the state exemption is only $675,000. Assume a combined estate at the first death of $2,775,000, where $675,000 is placed in a bypass or credit shelter trust at the first death and $2,100,000 remains in the hands of the surviving spouse. At the second death in New Jersey, $106,800 of New Jersey estate tax would become due; however, the assets would receive a step-up in basis and could be sold by the estate or heirs without income tax. If that same couple resided in Florida, there may be no estate or income tax.
Assume the assets of the bypass trust grew in value to $1,000,000, there would be no New Jersey estate tax to pay on the incremental growth. The $325,000, if taxed in the survivor’s estate, would attract an 8% tax or an additional $26,000. Notwithstanding, $325,000 of gain subject to state and federal income tax at a combined rate of consisting of 29.325%, 23.8% federal and 5.525% state using individual, not trust, tax rates. The strategy to save New Jersey estate tax of $26,000 costs $95,306 income tax.
If the assets, consisting of the $2,775,000 combined estate plus the hypothetical appreciation of $325,000 were held by the surviving spouse until death and reported in the taxable estate, the basis of assets would be fair market value and there would be no income tax on a sale shortly after death. The New Jersey estate tax on $3.1m would be $190,800. Compare that figure to $202,106, comprised of $95,306 of income tax and $106,800 of New Jersey estate tax.
The analysis ignores the ability of the second spouse to relocate to Florida, for example, and hold all of the assets until death. The example points out that trusts need to be more flexible, a topic to be covered in the next blog.
If you or someone you know is being harrassed over their taxes, check out the Scarinci Hollenbeck Tax Video Series: Are You Overassessed? on businesslawnews.com.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Will Stepping-Up The Basis of Assets Become More Important Than Avoiding Estate Tax?
Author: James F. McDonough
Trends come and go and taxation is no different. The change in 2001 to raise the estate tax exemption, now $5,340,000, and to lower the top estate tax rate, now 40%, shifted the emphasis in estate tax planning. The combined estates of most American couples will remain below $10,680,000, so estate tax is no longer a factor for these taxpayers. Recent changes in individual tax rates has caused another shift. Individual tax rates for capital gains were 15% rate in 2001; however, today capital gains are now taxed at 23.8% before state income taxes are considered. Although it is easier to avoid estate tax with the higher exemption, the heirs may lose 8% more on a sale of the asset. Planning for the multiple generations requires consideration of stepping up the basis of assets.
The plan, for individuals who do not reside in New Jersey and whose state death tax law tracks the federal exemption, is to hold assets until death and step-up their basis. In New Jersey, this strategy attracts a state death tax because the state exemption is only $675,000. Assume a combined estate at the first death of $2,775,000, where $675,000 is placed in a bypass or credit shelter trust at the first death and $2,100,000 remains in the hands of the surviving spouse. At the second death in New Jersey, $106,800 of New Jersey estate tax would become due; however, the assets would receive a step-up in basis and could be sold by the estate or heirs without income tax. If that same couple resided in Florida, there may be no estate or income tax.
Assume the assets of the bypass trust grew in value to $1,000,000, there would be no New Jersey estate tax to pay on the incremental growth. The $325,000, if taxed in the survivor’s estate, would attract an 8% tax or an additional $26,000. Notwithstanding, $325,000 of gain subject to state and federal income tax at a combined rate of consisting of 29.325%, 23.8% federal and 5.525% state using individual, not trust, tax rates. The strategy to save New Jersey estate tax of $26,000 costs $95,306 income tax.
If the assets, consisting of the $2,775,000 combined estate plus the hypothetical appreciation of $325,000 were held by the surviving spouse until death and reported in the taxable estate, the basis of assets would be fair market value and there would be no income tax on a sale shortly after death. The New Jersey estate tax on $3.1m would be $190,800. Compare that figure to $202,106, comprised of $95,306 of income tax and $106,800 of New Jersey estate tax.
The analysis ignores the ability of the second spouse to relocate to Florida, for example, and hold all of the assets until death. The example points out that trusts need to be more flexible, a topic to be covered in the next blog.
If you or someone you know is being harrassed over their taxes, check out the Scarinci Hollenbeck Tax Video Series: Are You Overassessed? on businesslawnews.com.