Gov. Phil Murphy Recently Signed Legislation Amending NJ’s Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA)
Governor Murphy recently signed legislation amending the state’s Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA). The amendments, often referred to as SRRA 2.0, represent the first significant changes since SRRA was enacted a decade ago.
SRRA overhauled how contaminated sites are remediated by creating the Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) program and shifting the day-to-day oversight of site remediation from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) to LSRPs. SRRA also established an affirmative obligation for persons to remediate any discharge for which they would be liable pursuant to the Spill Compensation and Control Act.
The amendments to SSRA set forth in P.L.2019, c.263 fine-tune SSRA and reflect lessons learned since the statute was enacted in 2009. Below are some of the most significant changes:
(1) Affidavit of Merit: In any action for damages for personal injuries, wrongful death, or property damage resulting from an alleged act of malpractice or negligence by an LSRP, a plaintiff must provide each defendant with an affidavit of merit. Otherwise, the case will be dismissed for failure to state a cause of action.
(2) Remediation Funding: The law amends the requirements governing the establishment of remediation funding sources, including when and how those remediation funding sources may be used, dispersed, and released. In addition, SRRA now allows entities to establish a surety bond from an entity that is listed as an acceptable surety on federal bonds in the United States Treasury Department Circular 570.
(3) Green Practices: The NJDEP must now encourage the use of green and sustainable practices during the remediation of a contaminated site.
(4) Notice to Municipalities: A notice of remediation activity must be provided to the municipalities and counties in which the site is located prior to the initiation of the remedial investigation.
(5) Responding to Public Inquiries: A person responsible for conducting a remediation must respond to any inquiries from the public regarding the status of the remediation. Such response must include either: (1) information or documents that are responsive to the public inquiry; or (2) a written summary status report for the remediation in a form and manner as determined by the NJDEP. A person responsible for conducting a remediation can designate an LSRP to respond to public inquiries.
(6) Reporting Discharges: If an LSRP who is retained to perform remediation at a site or any portion of a site obtains specific knowledge that a discharge has occurred at any location on the site, the LSRP must notify the person responsible for conducting the remediation and the NJDEP.
(7) Immediate Environmental Concerns: The definition of an immediate environmental concern (IEC) is amended to mean “migration of contamination into a structure” producing a toxic or harmful atmosphere or other harmful condition, eliminating that the structure be occupied. However, the amended law also provides that no further remediation relative to an IEC that affects an unoccupied structure is required if a person responsible for conducting the remediation provides to the NJDEP a written certification from the property owner that the building: (1) is not occupied; (2) will not be occupied; and (3) will be demolished.
(8) NJDEP Direct Oversight: The bill amends SRRA’s direct oversight provisions, in most cases making it less likely that the agency will intervene if the responsible party is taking appropriate and timely action. The amendments further provide that when a contaminated site is subject to direct oversight the requirements of direct oversight run with the site regardless of who owns the property and regardless of whether there is a transfer of ownership of the property.
(9) Remedial Action: A person who is issued a remedial action permit for the operation, maintenance, and inspection of engineering or institutional controls and related systems installed as part of a remedial action must retain an LSRP to manage, supervise, or perform the requirements of the permit for the duration of the permit.
(10) Additional LSRP Requirements: The amendments impose additional requirements on LSRPs. Notably, an LSRP may not certify any document submitted to the NJDEP unless the LSRP believes that the information in the submission is true, accurate, and complete. In addition, an LSRP is prohibited from facilitating, aiding, assisting, or cooperating with any person in retaining or arranging for the retention of any person who is not an LSRP to perform remediation, unless the remediation is managed, supervised, or periodically reviewed and evaluated by an LSRP retained for that purpose, and the NJDEP has been notified of the retention.
The amendments became effective immediately upon Governor Murphy signing the bill into law on August 23, 2019. If you have questions or concerns regarding how SRRA 2.0 may impact your operations, we encourage you to contact attorneys of the Scarinci Hollenbeck Environmental & Land Use Law Group.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Ten Key Changes to the New Jersey Site Remediation Reform Act
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Gov. Phil Murphy Recently Signed Legislation Amending NJ’s Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA)
Governor Murphy recently signed legislation amending the state’s Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA). The amendments, often referred to as SRRA 2.0, represent the first significant changes since SRRA was enacted a decade ago.
SRRA overhauled how contaminated sites are remediated by creating the Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) program and shifting the day-to-day oversight of site remediation from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) to LSRPs. SRRA also established an affirmative obligation for persons to remediate any discharge for which they would be liable pursuant to the Spill Compensation and Control Act.
The amendments to SSRA set forth in P.L.2019, c.263 fine-tune SSRA and reflect lessons learned since the statute was enacted in 2009. Below are some of the most significant changes:
(1) Affidavit of Merit: In any action for damages for personal injuries, wrongful death, or property damage resulting from an alleged act of malpractice or negligence by an LSRP, a plaintiff must provide each defendant with an affidavit of merit. Otherwise, the case will be dismissed for failure to state a cause of action.
(2) Remediation Funding: The law amends the requirements governing the establishment of remediation funding sources, including when and how those remediation funding sources may be used, dispersed, and released. In addition, SRRA now allows entities to establish a surety bond from an entity that is listed as an acceptable surety on federal bonds in the United States Treasury Department Circular 570.
(3) Green Practices: The NJDEP must now encourage the use of green and sustainable practices during the remediation of a contaminated site.
(4) Notice to Municipalities: A notice of remediation activity must be provided to the municipalities and counties in which the site is located prior to the initiation of the remedial investigation.
(5) Responding to Public Inquiries: A person responsible for conducting a remediation must respond to any inquiries from the public regarding the status of the remediation. Such response must include either: (1) information or documents that are responsive to the public inquiry; or (2) a written summary status report for the remediation in a form and manner as determined by the NJDEP. A person responsible for conducting a remediation can designate an LSRP to respond to public inquiries.
(6) Reporting Discharges: If an LSRP who is retained to perform remediation at a site or any portion of a site obtains specific knowledge that a discharge has occurred at any location on the site, the LSRP must notify the person responsible for conducting the remediation and the NJDEP.
(7) Immediate Environmental Concerns: The definition of an immediate environmental concern (IEC) is amended to mean “migration of contamination into a structure” producing a toxic or harmful atmosphere or other harmful condition, eliminating that the structure be occupied. However, the amended law also provides that no further remediation relative to an IEC that affects an unoccupied structure is required if a person responsible for conducting the remediation provides to the NJDEP a written certification from the property owner that the building: (1) is not occupied; (2) will not be occupied; and (3) will be demolished.
(8) NJDEP Direct Oversight: The bill amends SRRA’s direct oversight provisions, in most cases making it less likely that the agency will intervene if the responsible party is taking appropriate and timely action. The amendments further provide that when a contaminated site is subject to direct oversight the requirements of direct oversight run with the site regardless of who owns the property and regardless of whether there is a transfer of ownership of the property.
(9) Remedial Action: A person who is issued a remedial action permit for the operation, maintenance, and inspection of engineering or institutional controls and related systems installed as part of a remedial action must retain an LSRP to manage, supervise, or perform the requirements of the permit for the duration of the permit.
(10) Additional LSRP Requirements: The amendments impose additional requirements on LSRPs. Notably, an LSRP may not certify any document submitted to the NJDEP unless the LSRP believes that the information in the submission is true, accurate, and complete. In addition, an LSRP is prohibited from facilitating, aiding, assisting, or cooperating with any person in retaining or arranging for the retention of any person who is not an LSRP to perform remediation, unless the remediation is managed, supervised, or periodically reviewed and evaluated by an LSRP retained for that purpose, and the NJDEP has been notified of the retention.
The amendments became effective immediately upon Governor Murphy signing the bill into law on August 23, 2019. If you have questions or concerns regarding how SRRA 2.0 may impact your operations, we encourage you to contact attorneys of the Scarinci Hollenbeck Environmental & Land Use Law Group.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
