Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 16, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comApparently, back in March 2015, Google had to respond to the Wall Street Journal‘s report of how often Google held meetings with the White House (230 times to be exact, since Obama took office). Google’s response claimed that there were several different topics of conversation discussed over the course of these meetings, and that nothing shady was going on. However, speculation persists that the timing of these meetings in relation to other key events is extremely suspicious because a large number of these meetings occurred just before antitrust investigations on Google halted back in 2013. Google holds strong in saying that these meetings had nothing to do with the antitrust allegations.
The plot thickens as new reports, this time from The New York Times, reveal that Microsoft has connections, to varying degrees, with three of the initial complainants that spurred the antitrust investigation into Google.
SO, the main point of suspicion: Upsurge in the number of meetings just before U.S. antitrust investigations into Google ended in 2013, the end result of which was zero action.
Questions are now being raised about White House involvement in U.S. investigations into Google, and the Senate has decided to investigate. According to a recent article, “[a] Senate panel plans to investigate whether the White House inappropriately derailed a federal investigation into accusations that Google was stifling online competition.” If there were any truth to this theory, this may have a significant impact on Google’s business and the White House’s integrity.
Google’s troubles do not end there. It was announced on April 14, 2015 that Google is expected to face new antitrust charges from the European Commission. The charges allege that Google has been using its dominant position as a search engine to favor its services/products over those of other companies. Margrethe Vestager is currently the European Union’s top antitrust official and will be deciding what route the allegations will take.
Current discussion on the issue suggests that this is only the beginning of Europe taking on large American companies. European companies have yet to rival the success of several of America’s superpowers, such as Google – so this may also be a pointed effort at giving Europe’s own home grown companies a competitive edge. Regardless, Google is presently under a very large and powerful microscope and, potentially, in a lot of trouble. (Notwithstanding, of course, reports about Google’s message to its employees on Tuesday that it had a “very strong case” and is expected to defend itself robustly in what could become one of the most contentious antitrust cases since the EU took on Microsoft 10 years ago).
###
Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments concerning this topic? Feel free to leave a comment below and follow the twitter accounts @CyberPinguelo, @eWHW_Blog, @S_H_Law. If you have any questions about this post or would like assistance with your data security/privacy and related efforts, please contact Fernando M. Pinguelo or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn more about data privacy and security, visit eWhiteHouse Watch – Where Technology, Politics, and Privacy Collide.
Fernando acknowledges the notable contribution to this article from Ms. Jenna Methven, Chief Blog Correspondent and Blogger for eWhiteHouse Watch and a Monmouth University student.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Apparently, back in March 2015, Google had to respond to the Wall Street Journal‘s report of how often Google held meetings with the White House (230 times to be exact, since Obama took office). Google’s response claimed that there were several different topics of conversation discussed over the course of these meetings, and that nothing shady was going on. However, speculation persists that the timing of these meetings in relation to other key events is extremely suspicious because a large number of these meetings occurred just before antitrust investigations on Google halted back in 2013. Google holds strong in saying that these meetings had nothing to do with the antitrust allegations.
The plot thickens as new reports, this time from The New York Times, reveal that Microsoft has connections, to varying degrees, with three of the initial complainants that spurred the antitrust investigation into Google.
SO, the main point of suspicion: Upsurge in the number of meetings just before U.S. antitrust investigations into Google ended in 2013, the end result of which was zero action.
Questions are now being raised about White House involvement in U.S. investigations into Google, and the Senate has decided to investigate. According to a recent article, “[a] Senate panel plans to investigate whether the White House inappropriately derailed a federal investigation into accusations that Google was stifling online competition.” If there were any truth to this theory, this may have a significant impact on Google’s business and the White House’s integrity.
Google’s troubles do not end there. It was announced on April 14, 2015 that Google is expected to face new antitrust charges from the European Commission. The charges allege that Google has been using its dominant position as a search engine to favor its services/products over those of other companies. Margrethe Vestager is currently the European Union’s top antitrust official and will be deciding what route the allegations will take.
Current discussion on the issue suggests that this is only the beginning of Europe taking on large American companies. European companies have yet to rival the success of several of America’s superpowers, such as Google – so this may also be a pointed effort at giving Europe’s own home grown companies a competitive edge. Regardless, Google is presently under a very large and powerful microscope and, potentially, in a lot of trouble. (Notwithstanding, of course, reports about Google’s message to its employees on Tuesday that it had a “very strong case” and is expected to defend itself robustly in what could become one of the most contentious antitrust cases since the EU took on Microsoft 10 years ago).
###
Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments concerning this topic? Feel free to leave a comment below and follow the twitter accounts @CyberPinguelo, @eWHW_Blog, @S_H_Law. If you have any questions about this post or would like assistance with your data security/privacy and related efforts, please contact Fernando M. Pinguelo or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn more about data privacy and security, visit eWhiteHouse Watch – Where Technology, Politics, and Privacy Collide.
Fernando acknowledges the notable contribution to this article from Ms. Jenna Methven, Chief Blog Correspondent and Blogger for eWhiteHouse Watch and a Monmouth University student.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!