Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Judge to Rule Whether GM Bankruptcy Favored Hedge Funds Over Creditors
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: January 18, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Bankruptcy Judge to Provide Ruling
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Gerber is expected to hand down a ruling shortly on a controversial provision of the 2009 restructuring of General Motors, the results of which may cost GM upwards of $1 billion dollars.
The issue is whether GM unfairly favored hedge fund investors over its unsecured creditors when it entered into a “lock-up agreement” during its restructuring, in which it sent $367 million to a group of hedge funds, according to Reuters. The unsecured creditors argue that this lock-up agreement should be invalidated by Judge Gerber, asserting that
it was a secret deal that took place after the company filed for protection under bankruptcy law. As a result, the creditors say that the deal required Gerber’s approval before being honored.
GM and the hedge funds have responded to these claims by saying that the lock-up agreement took place prior to the bankruptcy and that the terms are included in security filings.
The hedge funds currently hold roughly $1 billion in notes at face value, and received a claim against GM for $2.67 billion, Reuters reports. While they received $367 million after the agreement, creditors received pennies on the dollar, the news source added.
Although Gerber has not yet issued a ruling, he did note his surprise at the agreement struck between hedge fund investors and GM.
“The bottom line is, is that this matter is huge,” Gerber said in a court hearing, according to Reuters. “There was a lack of disclosure to the court on the matter with the potential to injure ‘Old GM’ creditors to the extent of hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars.”
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
When a Child Turns 18: The Gap in Your Family’s Estate Plan
Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.