
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: January 26, 2016

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comOn Nov. 3, the renowned clean-tech fertilizer firm BioNitrogen Holdings Corp announced that it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. According to The Wall Street Journal, the company cited its $3.5 million in debt liabilities and a recent lawsuit against it as the primary reasons it sought bankruptcy protection.
BioNitrogen, the clean-tech firm that produced fertilizer from agricultural waste, had planned to build new plants in Florida. However, in a South Florida Business Journal report, at the time it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, the company listed assets between $1 million and $10 million, but had accrued $3.5 million in debt obligations to its largest secured creditor, Annon Consulting.
In fact, in October, Annon Consulting won a lawsuit with the company for $1.4 million as a result of the defaulted loan. BioNitrogen also cited that it had outstanding debts for unpaid federal payroll taxes for $124,318 and to various unsecured creditors, including several consulting firms such as Kaufman Rossin & Co. for $73,594.
BioNitrogen’s six related subsidiaries also filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Nov. 3, including BIO-SNG Technologies International Corp., 4A Technologies, BioNitrogen Plant FL Hendry, BioNitrogen Florida Holdings, BioNitrogen Plant FL Taylor and Hendry BN Construction & Fertilizer Services.
The complaint Annon filed in Florida federal court in January stated that its loan to BioNitrogen had been placed into default status. The WSJ reported that the company did not respond to the complaint until May due to turbulence in its senior executive level that delayed operations.
In court papers, BioNitrogen alleged that its former president, chief financial officer and executive board member Bryan Kornegay Jr. had been responsible for the defaulted loan. Kornegay was charged in 2014 with grand theft in excess of $100,000. However, according to a BioNitrogen report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission cited by The WSJ, these charges were later dismissed. An internal investigation is currently ongoing as the company claimed that Kornegay mishandled the company’s securities, investor funds and all related transactions, which led to BioNitrogen’s insolvency. According to Mitchell Herr, Kornegay’s lawyer, the company put itself in its tenuous financial position.
“It appears that BioNitrogen is insinuating that Mr. Kornegay engaged in financial impropriety and used BioNitrogen money and that allegation or insinuation is absolutely baseless,” Herr explained.
BioNitrogen listed Kornegay as a debtor in its bankruptcy filing after an assessment by a third-party accounting consultant found that the company in fact owes Kornegay in excess of several hundred thousand dollars.
Following the resignation of three members of its executive board, the company has replaced these officials and appointed an auditor, according to an Alternative Energy Stocks report.
BioNitrogen stated in its bankruptcy petition that it intends to seek financing or partnerships and emerge from the reorganization period as a viable business. The tentative debt restructuring proposal calls for the firm to leverage its intellectual property value.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!