Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
The Democrat appointees to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), by a 3-2 majority vote, recently finalized the SEC’s controversial pay ratio rule.
Mandated under the Dodd-Frank Act, the new disclosures will require companies to reveal how their chief executive officers’ compensation compares to their workforce at large.
The SEC pay ratio rule attracted more than 280,000 public comments. Supporters of the new rule maintain that it will discourage reckless compensation packages and help foster economic equality; meanwhile, critics argue that the rule’s recordkeeping obligations are unnecessary and will unduly burden businesses. “To say that the views on the pay ratio disclosure requirement are divided is an obvious understatement,” SEC Mary Jo White stated in advance of the vote, in which the Republican appointees cast the negative votes.
The final rule
The final rule specifically amends existing executive compensation disclosure rules to require companies to disclose: the median of the annual total compensation of all its employees (excluding the CEO); the annual total compensation of its CEO; and the ratio of the two amounts. In response to public comments, the final rule gives businesses some leeway in reporting their CEO pay ratios. However, it does not provide as much flexibility as business groups had requested.
Companies will have some input into how they make the calculations. For instance, the final rule authorizes the use of statistical sampling to define the compensation of an entity’s median employees. Businesses will also be allowed to exclude up to five percent of their non-U.S. employees from their calculations.
Companies would only be required to provide the new information in filings that must already include executive compensation information under Item 402 of Regulation S-K, such as registration statements, proxy and information statements, and annual reports. The SEC’s new corporate disclosure requirements would not apply to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies, and foreign private issuers.
Companies must begin submitting disclosures in the first fiscal year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2017. After the initial disclosure, updates are generally required every three years.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.