The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced its first settlement involving fraud allegations related to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)...
The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced its first settlement involving fraud allegations related to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). SlideBelts Inc., along with the company’s president and CEO, have agreed to pay a combined $100,000 in damages and penalties to resolve allegations that they committed fraud in connection with a $350,000 PPP loan. SlideBelts also repaid the PPP funds it received.
“The defendants made false statements to multiple banks in order to obtain a Paycheck Protection Program loan that should have been disbursed to an honest small business suffering financially from the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic,” U.S. Attorney McGregor W. Scott said in a press statement. “The Department of Justice and our partners at the SBA will use all tools at our disposal, including civil fraud statutes, to aggressively pursue those who exploit federal programs intended to help those in need during this national emergency.”
Allegations of PPP Fraud
As part of the settlement, Taylor and SlideBelts admitted that they made false statements to federally insured banks that SlideBelts was not in bankruptcy in order to influence those banks to approve, and the Small Business Administration (SBA) to guarantee, a PPP loan to SlideBelts. As a result of their false statements, SlideBelts received a PPP loan for $350,000. Months later, in response to demands by the federal government, SlideBelts returned the funds to the lender. Taylor and SlideBelts also admitted that their statements caused false claims to be made to the SBA in connection with the PPP loan.
The resulting DOJ civil enforcement action alleged that Taylor’s and SlideBelts’ misconduct violated the False Claims Act (FCA) and the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA). The FCA allows the government to recover damages and penalties for the presentation of false claims for payment to the United States. Meanwhile, FIRREA allows the government to impose civil penalties for violations of enumerated federal criminal statutes, including those that affect federally-insured financial institutions.
Lessons for PPP Borrowers
The DOJ, SBA, and other federal agencies are aggressively policing COVID-19 relief programs for potential fraud, and the recent settlement is likely just one of many to come, particularly given that the PPP has reopened to disperse another round of loans. In January, the DOJ stated that in the nine months since the PPP began, its Fraud Section attorneys have prosecuted more than 100 defendants in more than 70 criminal cases. It has also seized more than $60 million in cash proceeds derived from fraudulently obtained PPP funds, as well as numerous real estate properties and luxury items purchased with such proceeds.
If your business is participating in PPP or other COVID-19 relief program, be prepared for your application and your expenditures to be closely scrutinized for compliance with the program’s requirements, particularly with regard to loan eligibility and loan forgiveness. As highlighted by the recent DOJ settlement, misrepresentations on applications, certifications, or other program documents may give rise to a criminal fraud investigation or FCA violations. Since even inadvertent misstatements can lead to a costly and embarrassing investigation, it is essential to verify the accuracy of all information submitted, memorialize decision making in connection with the application process in writing, and keep detailed records of how the funds are expended. In addition, knowingly making false statements to federal law enforcement agents constitutes a crime punishable by a term of imprisonment. The DOJ has stated that it will not pursue businesses that have acted in good faith. However, should the DOJ uncover misconduct, the consequences can be significant. As demonstrated by the SlideBelts settlement, it may not be enough to simply repay the PPP loan. Borrowers may also have to pay damages and/or penalties, and executive officers could face personal liability. If you suspect that you or your business may be the subject of a criminal investigation, it imperative to contact an experienced white-collar criminal defense lawyer as soon as possible and certainly before meeting with state or federal law enforcement agents.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Bob Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
