The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced its first settlement involving fraud allegations related to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)...
The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced its first settlement involving fraud allegations related to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). SlideBelts Inc., along with the company’s president and CEO, have agreed to pay a combined $100,000 in damages and penalties to resolve allegations that they committed fraud in connection with a $350,000 PPP loan. SlideBelts also repaid the PPP funds it received.
“The defendants made false statements to multiple banks in order to obtain a Paycheck Protection Program loan that should have been disbursed to an honest small business suffering financially from the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic,” U.S. Attorney McGregor W. Scott said in a press statement. “The Department of Justice and our partners at the SBA will use all tools at our disposal, including civil fraud statutes, to aggressively pursue those who exploit federal programs intended to help those in need during this national emergency.”
Allegations of PPP Fraud
As part of the settlement, Taylor and SlideBelts admitted that they made false statements to federally insured banks that SlideBelts was not in bankruptcy in order to influence those banks to approve, and the Small Business Administration (SBA) to guarantee, a PPP loan to SlideBelts. As a result of their false statements, SlideBelts received a PPP loan for $350,000. Months later, in response to demands by the federal government, SlideBelts returned the funds to the lender. Taylor and SlideBelts also admitted that their statements caused false claims to be made to the SBA in connection with the PPP loan.
The resulting DOJ civil enforcement action alleged that Taylor’s and SlideBelts’ misconduct violated the False Claims Act (FCA) and the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA). The FCA allows the government to recover damages and penalties for the presentation of false claims for payment to the United States. Meanwhile, FIRREA allows the government to impose civil penalties for violations of enumerated federal criminal statutes, including those that affect federally-insured financial institutions.
Lessons for PPP Borrowers
The DOJ, SBA, and other federal agencies are aggressively policing COVID-19 relief programs for potential fraud, and the recent settlement is likely just one of many to come, particularly given that the PPP has reopened to disperse another round of loans. In January, the DOJ stated that in the nine months since the PPP began, its Fraud Section attorneys have prosecuted more than 100 defendants in more than 70 criminal cases. It has also seized more than $60 million in cash proceeds derived from fraudulently obtained PPP funds, as well as numerous real estate properties and luxury items purchased with such proceeds.
If your business is participating in PPP or other COVID-19 relief program, be prepared for your application and your expenditures to be closely scrutinized for compliance with the program’s requirements, particularly with regard to loan eligibility and loan forgiveness. As highlighted by the recent DOJ settlement, misrepresentations on applications, certifications, or other program documents may give rise to a criminal fraud investigation or FCA violations. Since even inadvertent misstatements can lead to a costly and embarrassing investigation, it is essential to verify the accuracy of all information submitted, memorialize decision making in connection with the application process in writing, and keep detailed records of how the funds are expended. In addition, knowingly making false statements to federal law enforcement agents constitutes a crime punishable by a term of imprisonment. The DOJ has stated that it will not pursue businesses that have acted in good faith. However, should the DOJ uncover misconduct, the consequences can be significant. As demonstrated by the SlideBelts settlement, it may not be enough to simply repay the PPP loan. Borrowers may also have to pay damages and/or penalties, and executive officers could face personal liability. If you suspect that you or your business may be the subject of a criminal investigation, it imperative to contact an experienced white-collar criminal defense lawyer as soon as possible and certainly before meeting with state or federal law enforcement agents.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Bob Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
