Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 25, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has announced that it is settling the sex discrimination lawsuit filed against Ventura Corporation. Ventura, based in Puerto Rico, is the wholesaler of beauty products, jewelry and other personal care items to retail sellers. This case should serve to remind us that discrimination is not just a “one way street.”
The EEOC’s lawsuit alleged that Ventura engaged in a pattern of refusing to elevate male applicants into Zone Manager and Support Manager positions. The case arose upon the complaint of employee Erick Zaya, who was promoted to be a Zone Manager only after he complained about the discriminatory practices. However, once promoted, it was alleged that Ventura set him up for failure and termination in retaliation for his complaints regarding the sex-based hiring practices.
Complicating the case, the EEOC charged that Ventura lost or destroyed a significant amount of important evidence, including job applications from qualified male applicants and emails from important decision-makers. If true, this would have constituted “spoliation,” which is the intentional destruction of evidence. As a result, the EEOC sought sanctions against Ventura. The court, agreeing with the EEOC, indicated that if the case proceeded to trial, it would instruct the jurors that they could assume that the missing evidence would support the EEOC’s allegations.
Ventura has agreed to pay $354,250 to settle the lawsuit, which includes $150,000 to be paid to the complainant. The remainder of the settlement funds will be distributed to a class of qualified male job applicants who applied, but were not considered by Ventura for Zone Manager or Support Manager positions from 2004 to present.
The settlement also requires Ventura to implement a detailed applicant tracking system and actively promote the accountability of supervisors for discrimination prevention. Ventura must provide anti-discrimination training to all of its employees, including specific training to managers who play a role in the hiring process. Finally, the EEOC is requiring Ventura to provide the agency with bi-annual hiring reports for three years.
“This case is another reminder that federal law protects both men and women from gender discrimination,” said Robert E. Weisberg, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Miami District Office. “We are pleased that we have been able to secure relief not only for Mr. Zayas, but also for the many qualified applicants who were not considered by Ventura for employment simply because they were male.”
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss sex discrimination in the workplace, please contact me, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!