
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 28, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comA four-and-a-half year bankruptcy case involving the failed Fontainebleau Las Vegas casino tower may be nearing an end. A U.S. bankruptcy judge said he was inclined to approve a settlement agreement in the messy Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings over the $2.9 billion tower, which is considered one of the largest busts in real estate history.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge A. Jay Cristol said he was considering approving a $178 million settlement that would pay contractors roughly 25 cents on the dollar, according to the Miami Herald. Additionally, construction lenders would recoup nearly $89 million.
“I certainly have sympathy for all of the people who have money coming to them and seem to have been waiting forever,” said Judge Cristol in a court hearing, according to the news source.
The settlement funds would come from several organizations and investors involved in the failed project. Approximately $93 million would come from sale proceeds paid by Carl Icahn when he purchased the unfinished tower in 2010. The Herald notes that the money has been in a frozen escrow account pending the bankruptcy outcome. Title companies that backed the project would add another $33 million to the settlement fund, and the remaining $50 million would come from a completion guarantee funded by Jeff and Jacquelyn Soffer.
Construction of the skyscraper was halted in mid-2009 after the toll of the economic crisis hit the commercial real estate market hard, and forced the owners of the unfinished Fontainebleau to seek protection under the bankruptcy law. The building is still in the skeletal stage, and Chris Giunchigliani, Clark County commissioner, said she has received a barrage of complaints over the stalled project, which is considered an eyesore by the city, according to 8 News Now.
“I’m glad if they do the settlement,” Giunchigliani told the news source. “If they’re working that off, that actually then helps clean or prepare the road for something to maybe happen there.”
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!