Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 14, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comSean Cunningham, an American film director, approached Victor Miller, a writer, in 1979 after the successful release of “Halloween,” and asked if he wanted to partner to create a new horror movie—what would ultimately become “Friday the 13th.” Miller was subsequently brought into development of the movie as a work-for-hire employee, according to Hollywood Reporter.
This is where the legal battle hits a gray area. While The Wrap reported that Miller had received residual financial remuneration over the past 36 years for his work on the film, he doesn’t actually own the rights to it. This is because Manny Company protests Miller was only brought on to help write the script after the original idea had been formed.
“Miller had never written a horror screenplay prior to his being hired by Cunningham and was guided in the process, and directly supervised, by Cunningham,” the complaint read. “Accordingly, Miller entered into an employment agreement with the Manny Company pursuant to which Miller wrote a screenplay for the Film as a work for hire.”
Miller, the plaintiff, is trying to use a specific copyright law loophole that would allow him to revoke ownership from Manny Company and Horror Inc., ComicBook.com reported. This is a tricky proposition for Miller, who has to successfully argue against the fact that he was hired specifically to write the script, and that he was, in fact, the sole proprietor of the idea behind “Friday the 13th.”
Manny Company and Horror Inc. aren’t the only companies involved in the lawsuit, though, as Georgetown Productions, a predecessor firm to Manny Company, financed the film back in 1980 on the grounds they would be assigned rights to the movie, according to Hollywood Reporter. This makes the case even more difficult for the courts, as the copyright is listed in Georgetown’s name and Miller’s supposed work-for-hire contract actually doesn’t list his status as an employee, the source reported. Still, Manny Company continues to vigorously defend the lawsuit.
“In addition to seeking a declaration of the parties’ respective rights, the Manny Company seeks a determination that Miller has materially breached the Employment Agreement, has slandered Horror’s title in “Friday the 13th,” and has engaged in unfair trade practices,” the complaint read.
Copyright lawsuits are notoriously messy, as, ironically, it’s often difficult for an author to prove ownership of his or her work, as seen by the plight of Miller. The case has yet to move along with legal proceedings, and it’s likely to take a while to do so.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!