
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: March 26, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comGeokinetics, a provider of seismic data, has filed for bankruptcy law protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in Wilmington, Delaware. The voluntary bankruptcy will help the company accomplish its previously announced financial restructuring.
The Houston-based corporation listed $12 million in assets and $351 million in liabilities. However, an agreement with the holders of more than 70 percent of its secured notes will enable Geokinetics to convert roughly $300 million of debt to equity. The company has also secured $25 million in debtor-in-possession financing from senior note holders to facilitate the bankruptcy process.
Furthermore, the company has submitted a prepackaged bankruptcy plan – which is subject to court approval – that will ensure that all unsecured creditors are paid in full once the plan is confirmed. The company said it has received overwhelming support from its stakeholders, and expects the bankruptcy court to approve the plan within 45 days.
“Today we have taken a decisive step to strengthen our balance sheet and emerge a stronger company that is well-positioned for growth on the horizon in all three product lines and enhances profitability, while maintaining our commitments to our customers, employees, and vendors,” said David Crowley, president and CEO of Geokinetics.
Geokinetics decided to restructure its company after it missed a $14.6 million interest payment due December 15 on the secured notes.
The company also noted that it plans to continue normal business operations and does not expect the restructuring to interrupt any aspect of its operations. It has petitioned the bankruptcy court to approve the payment of wages, salaries, and other employee benefits, as well as payments to certain critical vendors, including foreign vendors.
The corporation is currently the largest Western contractor that acquires and processes seismic data and provides multi-client seismic data to the oil and gas industry worldwide.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!