Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 6, 2023
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIn the highly competitive financial world, any organization, manager, or owner must ensure that your business’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) doesn’t have negative customer complaints. If you are looking for FINRA settlement solutions, keep reading.
Public investors often consult CRD through FINRA BrokerCheck before making investment decisions. The CRD system holds administrative data and disclosure information, including civil judicial actions, customer disputes, and regulatory disciplinary actions filed against your organization. It can be challenging to remain clean of any customer dispute in business, and such complaints can deny you or your firm significant business opportunities.
But worry not! If you are a registered representative and have a derogatory, false, factually impossible, or erroneous customer complaint on your CRD record, you can follow FINRA’s settlement procedure for expungement to have that information in the CRD system removed. An experienced FINRA expungement attorney can help you request expungement and ensure a successful FINRA arbitration settlement.
If you’re seeking to expunge any false or defamatory CRD disclosures on you, or your firm, through FINRA arbitration settlement, you must understand the process for successful expungement. This could include presenting a strong counterclaim or statement of claim to the arbitrators.
The arbitrators will analyze the facts of your statement against the derogatory complaints on your CRD database to determine whether to grant your request for expungement. Then, the arbitrators will decide your case based on at least one standard specified in FINRA’s Rule 2080. An experienced expungement attorney can understand the complexities of expungement and how to file a strong claim.
The expungement is a two-section process. Firstly, you initiate the expungement process through the FINRA Dispute Resolution Process, specifying the derogatory claim in the CRD you want to be removed. Next, a hearing is set to review the merits of your expungement request based on whether the evidence you provided attains one or more grounds for expungement. Arbitrators handling your FINRA arbitration settlement will hold a hearing session, virtual or in-person, and review all necessary documents. Arbitrators then conclude the process with a written settlement explaining reasons for denying or granting your expungement request.
In any FINRA settlement, the panel must review the amount paid to settle the claim, among other factors, and whether the issue is presented to a state court or arbitrators. According to the FINRA Notice to Members 08-79, the panel needs to consider any other terms and conditions of the complaint that can raise issues about your business’s involvement in the alleged misconduct before granting an expungement.
Rule 2080 outlines the grounds under which an expungement can be granted:
If your FINRA settlement succeeds in the arbitration stage, you must file a petition with a local or federal court with FINRA as the defendant, requesting the court to confirm the arbitrator’s decision to grant the expungement, unless FINRA grants a waiver. After reviewing your petition, the court will order FINRA to comply with the expungement decision by erasing the erroneous, factually impossible, and false information in question from the CRD database.
Brokers can seek successful expungement of customer disputes or allegations on a CRD report. However, seeking expungement on FINRA settlement can be daunting when you don’t understand the complexities of expungement or the process required. Nevertheless, the FINRA settlement process can be easier if you partner with experienced expungement attorneys.
At Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, we have experienced and fierce advocates committed to delivering practical and creative solutions to all our clients. The team understands the intricacies of the business world and can help you expunge an allegation from the CRD database. Contact us to discuss further with a member of our team.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!