
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: May 24, 2013

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comMany corporations call Delaware home because of its business friendly legal environment. It is an attractive place to incorporate a business, and it can also provide substantial court decision precedents for corporate disputes, making it more predictable as to what a Delaware court may do in deciding a disputed business matter as compared to states with substantially lesser numbers of such court cases.
One of the benefits Delaware seeks to provide that is currently under scrutiny is confidential commercial arbitration proceedings before the Delaware Court of Chancery. The so-called secret business court was created by statute in 2009, but was later ruled unconstitutional in Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. v. The Honorable Leo E. Strine Jr. The case is now pending before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
The 2009 law authorizes the Chancellor of the Delaware Chancery Court to appoint a Chancery Judge to serve as an arbitrator in business disputes involving at least $1 million. So long as both sides agree to participate, the proceedings remain entirely confidential and closed to the public. Cases do not even receive a docket number.
While businesses argue that the system provides a cost-effective and efficient means to resolve complex business litigation, open government groups and the media have raised concerns that it interferes with rights of public access to court proceedings.
“Neither Delaware’s desire to facilitate new revenue streams nor the business community’s desire to hide its conduct from public scrutiny justifies subverting the First Amendment,” the Delaware Coalition for Open Government argued in its brief before the Third Circuit. The Court of Chancery judges contend that public oversight is not needed in arbitration, where both parties have consented to the forum and the binding nature of the decision. The closed and confidential nature of similar arbitration proceedings is respected in other venues, such as in the securities and commodities industries, and in numerous other venues, such as the American arbitration Association, that provide for private arbitrations between consenting parties.
We will continue to track this case and provide updates as they become available.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!