Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Lose One, Settle One: SEC Needs to Choose Its Fights Carefully
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: November 1, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is publicly trying to rebuild its reputation as a tough enforcer. However, as the results of two recent cases demonstrate, you can’t win them all.
As we have previously discussed on this Business Law Blog, the SEC is moving away from its former policy of settling many cases on a neither-admit-nor-deny basis. Instead, the agency plans to take more cases to trial.
However, flamboyant businessman Mark Cuban recently took his chances at trial and won. The SEC accused the owner of the Dallas Mavericks of insider trading in connection with his sale of stock in search engine Momma.com, a claim Cuban vehemently denied. In the end, the jury cleared him of violating federal securities laws. They concluded that Cuban had not received material, non-public information or agreed not to trade on it.
The high-profile loss could be a setback for the SEC’s new enforcement regime and weaken its leverage at the negotiating table. However, the agency still has a good trial record, winning approximately 80 percent of its cases in recent years.
The SEC also still tends to resolve the majority of its cases outside the courtroom. Most recently, the agency reached a $200 million settlement with JPMorgan Chase & Co. The agency alleged that the firm misstated financial results and lacked effective internal controls to detect and prevent the now infamous “London Whale” trading losses.
In a significant victory for the SEC, the settlement also required JPMorgan to admit the facts underlying the SEC’s charges and publicly acknowledge that it violated the federal securities laws. The admission bolsters the agency’s new settlement policy and may encourage future wrongdoers to follow suit.
If you have any questions these cases or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Financial Services & Regulatory Practice
- Locations: New York City, Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.