Mergers and acquisitions can help companies achieve a number of strategic goals, including growth acceleration, improved performance, development of new skills/technology, and elimination of competition. They are also among the most complex business transactions. Before beginning the negotiation process, it is imperative to be well-versed in the merger and acquisition terminology that will be used by the parties and their counsel.
The type of transaction often dictates the legal terminology that is used. In an acquisition, one company acquires all or substantially all of the assets or stock (or other equity interests) in a target company. Whether the target company survives will depend upon whether the transaction is structured as an asset transaction or an equity transaction. In the former, the target company is often dissolved and ceases to exist after the transaction is completed. In the latter, the target company survives under new ownership and control. In a merger of the target company into the acquiring company, the acquiring company acquires all of the assets and liabilities of the target company by operation of law and only the acquiring company survives.
Mergers generally take one of the following forms:
Vertical: The transaction combines two companies that are in the same industry but operate in different parts of the chain of production, e.g., an ice cream shop merges with and into an ice cream manufacturer.
Horizontal: In this type of merger, one company merges or takes over another company that offers similar products and/or services to the public. In many cases, the two businesses are direct competitors, e.g., one ice cream manufacturer taking over another one.
Concentric Merger: Concentric mergers involve entities that serve the same customers in a particular industry, but offer different products and/or services. An example would be an ice cream shop merging with a hot dog stand.
Conglomerate Merger: This type of transaction involves two companies from completely different industries and is generally intended to assist with diversification.
Other Key Merger and Acquisition Terms
Being able to “talk the talk” allows business owners and managers to more fully participate in M&A transactions. Below are several legal terms that may be used:
Dilution: The reduction in earnings or stock value that can accompany a merger when more shares are issued or when convertible securities are converted into common stock.
Divestiture: Also known as a “spin-off,” the term refers to the sale of a business segment, typically an entire division or product line.
Due diligence: The process by which one party to the transaction, most often the buyer, investigates the other company, including its assets, financial condition, and liabilities (both actual and potential).
Friendly mergers or acquisition: As the term suggests, the transaction has the support of the target company’s management.
Hostile takeover: The target company opposes the attempt by a buyer to purchase the company.
Leveraged buyout: The management of the company acquires the target company rather than an outside buyer.
Raider: An acquiring company that actively seeks out entities with undervalued assets.
Shark repellant: Actions taken by a target company, such as amending its by-laws, to make itself less attractive to a hostile buyer.
White knight: A friendly buyer sought by the target to purchase the company instead of a hostile bidder.
This post provides only a brief look at the legal terms that may arise during a merger or acquisition. Prior to entering into any business transaction, it is imperative to work with an experienced attorney who can walk you through the process and answer any questions you may have. Therefore, if you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Charles Friedrich, at 201-806-3364.
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
