
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 5, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comOn Oct. 2, Miller Energy Resources Inc., one of the major oil and gas producers in the U.S., announced that it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. According to the Wall Street Journal, Miller Energy plans to hand over control of operations to Apollo Investment Corp. and Highbridge Capital Management LLC.
The company cited several issues contributing to its decision to seek Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, but chief among them was the rapid decline of prices in the energy markets. Like many independent companies in the oil and gas commodities sectors, Miller Energy was deeply affected by the plummeting price of oil. In bankruptcy papers, company officials stated that the price of Brent crude oil has dropped from over $100 per barrel in the summer of 2014 to $45 per barrel this summer. With these falling prices came a substantial drop in revenues, leading the company into record losses. As a result, the company’s revenues were down by 30 percent in the third quarter of 2015 to $15.5 million, with a $111 million net loss for the year to date.
In its court documents cited by a Reuters report, Miller Energy listed approximately $393 million in assets with only $6.2 million in cash on hand, and $336 million in liabilities with over $183 million in debt. Then as the company faced an involuntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition from creditors of its Inlet Energy LLC subsidiary, Miller Energy decided to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. According to a separate Wall Street Journal report, these creditors, Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., M-I LLC and Schlumberger Tech. Corp. claimed that Miller Energy owed them $2.8 million.
Miller Energy had initially negotiated a deal with a lender for $165 million in operating capital, but the involuntary bankruptcy filing and a fraud charge levied against the company by the Securities and Exchange Commission led to the termination of the agreement, which forced the company into insolvency.
The SEC charged Miller Energy with accounting fraud in August after it was reported that several companies were owed millions of dollars from a subsidiary of Miller Energy. In the lawsuit, the SEC claimed that the company overstated the value of its asset holdings by over $400 million after it acquired $2.5 million in oil and gas assets in 2009, according to a report by Fuel Fix. This not only inflated the valuation of Miller Energy’s net income and total assets, but it vaulted the company from a $0.61 per share penny stock to an asset traded on Nasdaq for $6.60 per share. It reached the New York Stock Exchange in 2013 when it traded at its peak of $8.83 per share.
As a result of the fraud charge, Miller Energy has agreed to pay $5 million each year till 2018 as part of a deal reached with the SEC.
As part of the restructuring deal, which is subject to court approval, Miller Energy will receive $20 million in financing from a debtor in possession agreement from its junior lenders Apollo Investment Corp., an arm of Apollo Global Management, and Highbridge Capital Management LLC, the investment management branch of JPMorgan Chase & Co. In the agreement, Apollo Investment Corp. and Highbridge Capital Management LLC will exchange over $190 million in Miller Energy’s second-lien debt for new debt and 100 percent equity in the company, according to Seeking Alpha. The deal would also provide the company’s unsecured creditors with warrants to buy equity stakes in the company as well as the chance to recover a minimum amount of cash. In turn, the agreement would also give preferred and common shareholders warrants to purchase equity.
The proposed agreement is also subject to approval from the SEC because its settlement would be applicable to the company.
The $20 million debtor in possession financing will be used to maintain operations through the bankruptcy period because the company intends to emerge from the restructuring process as a viable business, according to a report by the Houston Business Journal. However, before the company can emerge from the bankruptcy period, there are several issues facing Miller Energy.
It has an outstanding $82.5 million impairment fee on an unproductive well as well as over $14 million in charges on drilling rigs. Perhaps even more pressing for the company though is that Miller Energy could be de-listed from the New York Stock Exchange following its civil action with the SEC. This is due to the fact that the company has been priced below the $1 threshold since April.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!