
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 5, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comOn Oct. 2, Miller Energy Resources Inc., one of the major oil and gas producers in the U.S., announced that it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. According to the Wall Street Journal, Miller Energy plans to hand over control of operations to Apollo Investment Corp. and Highbridge Capital Management LLC.
The company cited several issues contributing to its decision to seek Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, but chief among them was the rapid decline of prices in the energy markets. Like many independent companies in the oil and gas commodities sectors, Miller Energy was deeply affected by the plummeting price of oil. In bankruptcy papers, company officials stated that the price of Brent crude oil has dropped from over $100 per barrel in the summer of 2014 to $45 per barrel this summer. With these falling prices came a substantial drop in revenues, leading the company into record losses. As a result, the company’s revenues were down by 30 percent in the third quarter of 2015 to $15.5 million, with a $111 million net loss for the year to date.
In its court documents cited by a Reuters report, Miller Energy listed approximately $393 million in assets with only $6.2 million in cash on hand, and $336 million in liabilities with over $183 million in debt. Then as the company faced an involuntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition from creditors of its Inlet Energy LLC subsidiary, Miller Energy decided to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. According to a separate Wall Street Journal report, these creditors, Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., M-I LLC and Schlumberger Tech. Corp. claimed that Miller Energy owed them $2.8 million.
Miller Energy had initially negotiated a deal with a lender for $165 million in operating capital, but the involuntary bankruptcy filing and a fraud charge levied against the company by the Securities and Exchange Commission led to the termination of the agreement, which forced the company into insolvency.
The SEC charged Miller Energy with accounting fraud in August after it was reported that several companies were owed millions of dollars from a subsidiary of Miller Energy. In the lawsuit, the SEC claimed that the company overstated the value of its asset holdings by over $400 million after it acquired $2.5 million in oil and gas assets in 2009, according to a report by Fuel Fix. This not only inflated the valuation of Miller Energy’s net income and total assets, but it vaulted the company from a $0.61 per share penny stock to an asset traded on Nasdaq for $6.60 per share. It reached the New York Stock Exchange in 2013 when it traded at its peak of $8.83 per share.
As a result of the fraud charge, Miller Energy has agreed to pay $5 million each year till 2018 as part of a deal reached with the SEC.
As part of the restructuring deal, which is subject to court approval, Miller Energy will receive $20 million in financing from a debtor in possession agreement from its junior lenders Apollo Investment Corp., an arm of Apollo Global Management, and Highbridge Capital Management LLC, the investment management branch of JPMorgan Chase & Co. In the agreement, Apollo Investment Corp. and Highbridge Capital Management LLC will exchange over $190 million in Miller Energy’s second-lien debt for new debt and 100 percent equity in the company, according to Seeking Alpha. The deal would also provide the company’s unsecured creditors with warrants to buy equity stakes in the company as well as the chance to recover a minimum amount of cash. In turn, the agreement would also give preferred and common shareholders warrants to purchase equity.
The proposed agreement is also subject to approval from the SEC because its settlement would be applicable to the company.
The $20 million debtor in possession financing will be used to maintain operations through the bankruptcy period because the company intends to emerge from the restructuring process as a viable business, according to a report by the Houston Business Journal. However, before the company can emerge from the bankruptcy period, there are several issues facing Miller Energy.
It has an outstanding $82.5 million impairment fee on an unproductive well as well as over $14 million in charges on drilling rigs. Perhaps even more pressing for the company though is that Miller Energy could be de-listed from the New York Stock Exchange following its civil action with the SEC. This is due to the fact that the company has been priced below the $1 threshold since April.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The application of traditional federal securities laws to crypto assets continues to evolve. In some cases, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) considers tokens and other digital assets to be securities. This makes them subject to federal securities law, including the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This classification has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins

While the New York City real estate market can be extremely competitive, moving too quickly often backfires. Before purchasing a condominium or cooperative in New York City, it is important to do you homework. Purchasing property in NYC can involve a dizzying number of legal issues. These include condo and co-op rules, rent restrictions, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro

Smart contracts feature a unique blend of legal agreement and technical code. This innovation has the potential to reshape how business is conducted. At the same time, smart contract legal issues around enforceability, jurisdiction, identity, and compliance are common. The legal framework for these self-executing agreements is still evolving. What Are Smart Contracts? Smart contracts, […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins

Retaining top talent continues to be one of the greatest challenges facing employers today. Even in an employer’s market, the loss of a key employee can disrupt operations and result in significant costs. While compensation plays a role, long-term retention often depends on workplace culture, communication, and employee engagement. One increasingly popular strategy for improving […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano

Secured transactions form the backbone of a wide range of business dealings, including business loans, mortgages, and inventory financing. Because the stakes are often high and relatively minor oversights can have drastic consequences, lenders and borrowers should thoroughly understand how to form an enforceable security agreement that protects their legal rights. What Is a Secured […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Cashing a check marked “paid in full” can be a risky endeavor, particularly if you don’t fully understanding the legal implications. If you are owed more than the amount of the check you accept and deposit, you may waive your right to collect the full disputed amount. That is why you should consider either rejecting […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!