
Charles H. Friedrich, III
Partner
201-896-7031 cfriedrich@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Charles H. Friedrich, III
Date: December 13, 2017

Partner
201-896-7031 cfriedrich@sh-law.comNegotiating the terms of a merger or acquisition is often the most time-consuming and complex aspect of the transaction. As a result, businesses often overlook the details, such as verifying that they have satisfied their statutory obligations under New Jersey law.

Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 14A:10-1, any two or more domestic corporations, or any one or more domestic corporations and any one or more other business entities (including, among others, partnerships and limited liability companies), may merge into one of such corporations or other business entities pursuant to a plan of merger that contains the following information:
Once such board approval has been obtained, the plan of merger must be submitted to a vote at a meeting of shareholders. In most cases, the plan must be approved by a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of each corporation entitled to vote. This required shareholder vote may also be taken without a meeting, but only if (a) all shareholders consent thereto in writing or (b) all shareholders entitled to vote consent thereto in writing and 20-days prior written notice of the action to be taken is given to all other shareholders.
Each corporation must execute a certificate of merger which must state the following:
The executed original and a copy of the certificate of merger must then be filed with the New Jersey Filing Office. The merger will become effective upon the date of the filing or at a later time designated by the parties, but not to exceed 90 days after the date of filing.
Additional requirements must be met if the surviving corporation or other business entity is not a New Jersey corporation or other business entity and is not qualified to do business in New Jersey, including the requirement that a tax clearance certificate be obtained from the New Jersey Division of Revenue for each constituent corporation or other business entity that is registered in New Jersey.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Charles Friedrich, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!