Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 4, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comNew York Gov. Andrew Cuomo recently signed a new law, effective March 1, 2014, that will punish businesses in the transportation and delivery industries that misclassify workers who deliver commercial goods as being independent contractors.
The New York Commercial Goods Transportation Industry Fair Play Act applies to all “commercial goods transportation contractors,” which are defined as New York sole proprietorships, partnership, corporations, or other business entities that compensate commercial drivers who have a commercial driver’s license to transport goods in New York State.
The new law creates a presumption that any person operating a commercial motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of more than 10,000 pounds performing transportation services of commercial goods for a commercial goods transportation contractor is an employee and not an independent contractor unless one of two tests is satisfied. The first test determines whether the worker is an independent contractor while the second determines whether the worker qualifies as a separate business entity.
Any New York business violating the law may be subject to civil penalties of up to $1,500 for a first violation and up to $5,000 for a subsequent violation within a five-year period. Willful violations (when the company knew or should have known that it was committing a violation) can result in monetary fines of up to $2,500 per worker for the first violation and up to $5,000 per worker for subsequent violations within a five-year period.
The law also adds potential criminal liability for those who are found to have willfully violated the law. A first offense is punishable as a misdemeanor and may include imprisonment of up to 30 days or a fine of up to $25,000. Any subsequent offense exposes the employer to up to 60 days’ imprisonment and a fine not to exceed $50,000.
Where the commercial goods transportation contractor is a corporation, each shareholder owning 10 percent or more of the company and each officer “who knowingly permits the corporation to willfully violate” the new law shall be personally liable for the civil and criminal penalties upon conviction. In addition, controlled group liability will be imposed upon any “substantially owned affiliated entity.”
New York has adopted a tough approach to worker misclassification in the trucking industry. To avoid costly compliance failures, trucking businesses that employ “independent contractors” should work closely with experienced counsel to determine if such workers need to be reclassified in light of the new, more stringent requirements.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!