
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 17, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe iconic New York City Opera, a top cultural and historic attraction in the city for more than 70 years, has announced it will be closing its doors and has filed for bankruptcy protection.
After its attempt to raise $7 million through aggressive fund-raising efforts failed, the company said its only option to overcome its financial shortfalls was to file for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law. The struggling opera company had sought to raise these funds by September 30, but spokeswoman Risa Heller said that only about $2 million had been donated, plus an additional $301,019 in pledges.
“New York City Opera did not achieve the goal of its emergency appeal,” Heller said. “Today, the board and management will begin the necessary financial and operational steps to wind down the company, including initiating the Chapter 11 process.”
The city opera ran into financial difficulties as a result of several poor decisions by its board of directors, CBS News reports. This includes the board’s choice to close the opera for the 2008-09 season while its auditorium underwent reconstruction. The company has also been criticized for hiring Gerard Mortier as artistic director, who later backed out before the season began. The board’s fateful decision to leave the Lincoln Center after the 2010-11 season in favor of playing at various venues throughout the city also led to a steep decline in revenue. Lastly, records show that City Opera’s endowment has shrunk from $48 million in 2008 to $5.07 million at the end of June 2012, the New York Times reports.
The company filed for bankruptcy protection with the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York and listed assets of $7.7 million and liabilities of $5.6 million, including pension obligations. In addition to its pension responsibilities, the city opera listed its largest creditor as the New York City Ballet. The ballet has a $1.6 million claim against the opera company.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!