
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: June 24, 2014

Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comAllegations of negligent security can be costly for New Jersey businesses, as evidenced by a recent $7.8 million settlement. An apartment owner, management company, and security provider will all pay millions of dollars for failing to prevent a stabbing death at an apartment complex in Jersey City.
While New Jersey businesses are typically not responsible for the wrongdoing of third parties, they do have an obligation to keep the premises safe for those who enter. This includes taking reasonable steps to secure common areas against foreseeable criminal activity that is likely to occur without precautionary measures.
In Estate of Reyes v. Westgate Management, the family of murder victim Jacqueline Reyes sued Paulus Hook Community Housing Corp.; management company Westgate Management of Lawrenceville; and security contractor DMS Security Systems. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants were negligent because security guards were no longer on duty when the attack occurred at approximately 8:30 a.m.
Meanwhile, the defendants maintained that the security measures were adequate, highlighting that security was provided from 4 p.m. to 8 a.m. They further argued that the crime likely could not have been prevented because the perpetrator targeted the victim as part of a drug dispute.
Under New Jersey’s premises liability laws, plaintiffs must generally prove that the property owner owed a duty of care; knew or should have known that there was a likelihood of criminal activity on the premises; failed to provide adequate security; and subsequently caused the plaintiff harm. Most negligent security claims turn on the foreseeability of the criminal act.
In this case, the parties reached settlement just short of trial. Westgate Management and Paulus Hook agreed to pay $6 million, while DMS Security Systems is responsible for $1.8 million.
To prevent similar liability, property owners are reminded to review their security policies and procedures regularly, particularly in the wake of known criminal activity. Insufficient lighting, broken security cameras, and faulty window locks could all lead to costly legal headaches.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss New Jersey’s premises liability laws, please contact me, Robert Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!