Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 25, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comJoan Rivers is not always known for her tactful language and political correctness, but a recent appeals court sided with the comedian in a recent privacy lawsuit brought on by fan who attended a show that appeared in Rivers’ 2010 documentary.
The plaintiff, Ann Bogie, was filmed having a discussion with Joan Rivers during the autograph session of the show backstage, and ultimately filed suit after the 16-second clip appeared in the “Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work” documentary, arguing that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy. The documentary features a show in Wisconsin, during which the 76-year-old made a Helen Keller joke that offended an audience member, who interrupted the show to remark that his son was deaf and he found the quip offensive.
“Oh please, you are so stupid,” Rivers said. “Comedy is to make everybody laugh at everything and deal with things. You idiot.”
Backstage following the encounter, Bogie told Rivers she “had never laughed so hard in her life,” and called the heckler in the audience a “rotten guy.” When the clip appeared in the documentary, Bogie sued Rivers and said the surprise appearance in the film misappropriated her image and violated her privacy. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court decision that dismissed Bogie’s privacy claims and asserted that no person could have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a backstage area.
“Assuming that Bogie was invited backstage, that would not advance her claim of a reasonable expectation of privacy,” Judge David Hamilton wrote for the panel. “The film shows that any such invitation was to obtain a backstage autograph from a celebrity in the presence of several security personnel and a film crew. No reasonable person would expect privacy in that situation.”
This is not the first time audience members that have appeared in documentaries have brought privacy suits against celebrities. Several people who appeared in a number of Sacha Baron Cohen films, including Borat, sued the actor and argued that he violated several provisions of entertainment law. However, nearly all of these plaintiffs lost their lawsuits.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Joan Rivers is not always known for her tactful language and political correctness, but a recent appeals court sided with the comedian in a recent privacy lawsuit brought on by fan who attended a show that appeared in Rivers’ 2010 documentary.
The plaintiff, Ann Bogie, was filmed having a discussion with Joan Rivers during the autograph session of the show backstage, and ultimately filed suit after the 16-second clip appeared in the “Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work” documentary, arguing that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy. The documentary features a show in Wisconsin, during which the 76-year-old made a Helen Keller joke that offended an audience member, who interrupted the show to remark that his son was deaf and he found the quip offensive.
“Oh please, you are so stupid,” Rivers said. “Comedy is to make everybody laugh at everything and deal with things. You idiot.”
Backstage following the encounter, Bogie told Rivers she “had never laughed so hard in her life,” and called the heckler in the audience a “rotten guy.” When the clip appeared in the documentary, Bogie sued Rivers and said the surprise appearance in the film misappropriated her image and violated her privacy. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court decision that dismissed Bogie’s privacy claims and asserted that no person could have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a backstage area.
“Assuming that Bogie was invited backstage, that would not advance her claim of a reasonable expectation of privacy,” Judge David Hamilton wrote for the panel. “The film shows that any such invitation was to obtain a backstage autograph from a celebrity in the presence of several security personnel and a film crew. No reasonable person would expect privacy in that situation.”
This is not the first time audience members that have appeared in documentaries have brought privacy suits against celebrities. Several people who appeared in a number of Sacha Baron Cohen films, including Borat, sued the actor and argued that he violated several provisions of entertainment law. However, nearly all of these plaintiffs lost their lawsuits.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!