Whether a recording artist is trying to pay homage to a favorite musician or simply like a song and want to make it their own, sampling past music for their own use.
Before releasing the music commercially, artists need to be sure that they get legal permission for sampling another artists music – or else they could end up being sued and prevented from releasing the music to the public, as there is an entertainment law protecting music.
Sampling clearance is needed to avoid legal issues, as this means artists got the permission to use the other musician’s song. Music needs to be cleared with two parties to be legally cleared: the person who owns the sound recording and the song publisher. Without permission from both parties, an artist could be sued if the sampled music is released to the public for commercial reasons.
Robin Thicke – singer of the hit song “Blurred Lines” – is currently facing a lawsuit from Marvin Gaye’s children, who claim Thicke allegedly ripped off their father’s song “Got to Give It Up.” Thicke and the other parties who worked on the song filed a countersuit asking a federal judge to rule that Blurred Lines was not a copyright infringement.
There are situations when sample clearance isn’t required. People who just use the music at home generally don’t need to go through the process of clearing any samples. Also, artists who only use sample music in live shows may not have to get the sample cleared. Musicians may also be safe if the average listener would be unable to notice similarities between the product and the sample.
No matter the case, musicians who plan on sampling music in their work should err on the side of caution and seek the advice of a Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney to avoid any unwanted legal headaches.
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
