
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comIn regards to the 2015 exam priorities, the report should be required reading for all investment professionals under the agency’s purview, most notably investment advisers, broker-dealers, and transfer agents.
“We share our 2015 examination priorities to promote compliance,” said Andrew J. Bowden, Director of the agency’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE). “We have observed that when we share our areas of focus, many industry participants independently review their controls in the areas we have identified.”
According to the SEC, its specific priorities revolve around three areas: protecting retail investors, especially those saving for or in retirement; assessing market-wide risks; and using data analytics to identify signs of potential illegal activity. Below are specific issues that the OCIE identified in its report:
Examiners will continue to target newly registered municipal advisors to assess their compliance with recently adopted SEC and Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board rules. Similarly, the SEC will also continue its efforts to examine selected registered investment companies that have not yet been examined.
Citing the high rate of deficiencies that it has observed among advisers to private equity funds in connection with fees and expenses, the SEC plans to continue to conduct examinations in this area.
The agency plans to monitor the largest U.S. broker-dealers and asset managers for the purpose of assessing risks at individual firms and maintaining early awareness of developments industry-wide.
The SEC expects to continue and expand its initiative to examine broker-dealers’ and investment advisers’ cybersecurity compliance and controls.
The SEC will scrutinize the supervision of registered representatives and financial adviser representatives in branch offices, including using data analytics to identify branches that may be deviating from compliance practices of the firm’s home office.
The SEC intends to evaluate registered firms’ recommendations or determinations to invest retirement assets into complex or structured products and higher yield securities, including whether the due diligence conducted, the disclosures made, and the suitability of the recommendations or determinations are consistent with existing legal requirements.
For advisers that offer a range of fee structures, the SEC will evaluate the recommendations of account types and whether they are in the best interest of the client at the inception of the arrangement and thereafter, including fees charged, services provided, and disclosures made about such relationships.
The SEC intends to allocate more resources to examine transfer agents, particularly those that are involved with microcap securities and private offerings.
The agency plans to use its growing capabilities to pursue initiatives involving microcap fraud, excessive trading, anti-money laundering programs, and recidivist brokers.
Despite a stated lack of resources, the SEC is still working to prove that it can handle the growing task of examining financial advisers as well as preventing securities fraud before it harms investors. Accordingly, registered firms should be prepared to face a heightened enforcement environment for the foreseeable future.
Are you on top of the 2015 exam priorities? What was your experience? Feel free to leave a comment in the section below.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!