The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continues to ramp up its enforcement of the Federal Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). In 2010, the SEC’s Enforcement Division created a specialized unit dedicated to enforcement of the FCPA, which prohibits U.S. companies from bribing foreign officials for government contracts and other business. To date, the agency has brought and settled nine separate enforcement actions in 2015.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (BMS) is the most recent company to resolve FCPA charges. The company will pay nearly $14.7 million to settle allegations that its joint venture in China bribed health care providers at state-controlled hospitals in an effort to boost drug sales.
“Certain sales representatives of the joint venture improperly generated funds that were used to provide corrupt inducements [to health care providers] in the form of cash payments, gifts, meals, travel, entertainment, and sponsorships for conferences and meetings in order to secure new sales and increase existing sales,” the SEC stated. “BMS falsely recorded the relevant transactions as legitimate business expenses in its books and records.”
Additional enforcement actions
More enforcement actions are expected in the coming months. In addition to resolved cases, at least 78 companies reported that they are subject to an ongoing FCPA investigation in SEC filing as of September 30, according to Corporate Counsel.
In several cases, the FCPA violations did not involve outright bribes, suggesting that the SEC is making good on its “broken windows” policy in the FCPA arena. As we have previously mentioned on this blog, under the leadership of SEC Chair Mary Jo White, the agency’s enforcement policy is to “pursue even the smallest infractions” as a means of deterring more serious violations.
In its case against Hyperdynamics Corporation, the SEC alleged that the energy company committed books and records and internal controls offenses. Notably, the Department of Justice concluded its FCPA investigation without bringing charges. According to the SEC, Hyperdynamics failed to accurately record certain payments made by its subsidiary based in the Republic of Guinea and also failed to determine whether the company’s subsidiary paid related parties. Last month, Hyperdynamics resolved the FCPA charges by agreeing to pay the SEC $75,000.
In light of the SEC’s increased attention on the FCPA, corporations should focus on strengthening their internal controls and compliance efforts. As the latest enforcement actions highlight, even small violations can lead to costly legal headaches.
Company Dissolved? Legal and Financial Consequences to Expect
A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences. It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]
The Legal Implications of Signing a Triple Net Lease
A triple net lease is a commercial lease in which the tenant pays the property’s real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs, known as the three nets, in addition to base rent. They are most often used in freestanding retail and office buildings and in large single-tenant industrial properties, with terms that typically run 10 […]
When to Settle and When to Fight: A Litigator's Framework
Every lawsuit comes with a cost, and knowing when to settle a lawsuit is one of the most consequential decisions a business owner will face. Experienced litigators understand how to minimize cost and obtain certainty for their clients. For many business owners, the decision is viewed almost entirely through a financial lens: What will it cost […]
A Whistleblower Just Filed a Complaint Against Your Company: Here's What to Do Now
Few situations create more uncertainty than learning that an employee has filed a whistleblower complaint. Questions arise immediately: Is the allegation legitimate? Should the employee be placed on leave? Do we need to notify our insurance carrier? Are we now prevented from disciplining the employee if there are unrelated ongoing work related issues? There is […]
Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors: An Alternative to Bankruptcy for Distressed Businesses
When a business reaches the point where it can no longer service its debts or otherwise resolve its liabilities, management is often faced with a difficult question: is a bankruptcy filing necessary or is there another way to perform an orderly liquidation or sale of the business assets? While Chapters 7 and 11 of the […]
Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know
For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
