Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Latest FCC Ruling Will Likely Fuel TCPA Class-Action Lawsuits
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: July 20, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
On July 10, 2015, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released its much-anticipated Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Omnibus Declaratory Ruling.
The FCC’s broad interpretation of the TCPA is likely to further fuel the growing trend of class-action litigation against unsuspecting businesses.
The TCPA prohibits the use of “any telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send, to a telephone facsimile machine, an unsolicited advertisement․” The statute contains three notable exceptions: (1) if a prior business relationship exists between the parties; (2) if the recipient voluntarily makes its fax number available for “public distribution”; or, (3) if the advertisement contains a notice informing the recipient of the ability and means to avoid future unsolicited advertisements.
In addition to authorizing regulatory enforcement, the TCPA provides a private cause of action. Since the TCPA authorizes statutory damages of $500-$1,500 per violation, which generally exceeds the recipient’s actual damages, TCPA violations are attractive to plaintiffs’ class-action lawyers.
Issues that may cause TCPA class-action lawsuits
The latest FCC declaratory ruling clarifies a number of issues that may make it easier for plaintiffs to successfully bring TCPA class-action lawsuits. Below are just a few of the agency’s findings:
- Callers cannot avoid obtaining consumer consent for a robocall simply because they are not “currently” or “presently” dialing random or sequential phone numbers;
- Simply being on an acquaintance’s phone contact list does not amount to consent to receive robocalls from third-party applications downloaded by the acquaintance;
- Callers are liable for robocalls to reassigned wireless numbers when the current subscriber to or customary user of the number has not consented, subject to a limited, one-call exception for cases in which the caller does not have actual or constructive knowledge of the reassignment;
- Internet-to-phone text messages require consumer consent; Text messages are “calls” subject to the TCPA;
- Consumers may revoke consent at any time and through any reasonable means; and
- Nothing in the Communications Act or our implementing rules prohibits carriers or Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers from implementing consumer-initiated call-blocking technology that can help consumers stop unwanted robocalls.
The FCC’s intent is to protect consumers from unwanted solicitations via telephone, fax, and text message. However, the agency’s expansive interpretation of the TCPA is likely to increase the likelihood that businesses will unwittingly violate the law and open themselves up to costly class-action lawsuits. Given the liability risk, we encourage business owners to review the FCC ruling and contact experienced counsel with any questions or concerns. Robert Levy, Chair of our Litigation Group, has litigated these issues and is available for consultation.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Latest FCC Ruling Will Likely Fuel TCPA Class-Action Lawsuits
Author: Robert E. Levy
On July 10, 2015, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released its much-anticipated Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Omnibus Declaratory Ruling.
The FCC’s broad interpretation of the TCPA is likely to further fuel the growing trend of class-action litigation against unsuspecting businesses.
The TCPA prohibits the use of “any telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send, to a telephone facsimile machine, an unsolicited advertisement․” The statute contains three notable exceptions: (1) if a prior business relationship exists between the parties; (2) if the recipient voluntarily makes its fax number available for “public distribution”; or, (3) if the advertisement contains a notice informing the recipient of the ability and means to avoid future unsolicited advertisements.
In addition to authorizing regulatory enforcement, the TCPA provides a private cause of action. Since the TCPA authorizes statutory damages of $500-$1,500 per violation, which generally exceeds the recipient’s actual damages, TCPA violations are attractive to plaintiffs’ class-action lawyers.
Issues that may cause TCPA class-action lawsuits
The latest FCC declaratory ruling clarifies a number of issues that may make it easier for plaintiffs to successfully bring TCPA class-action lawsuits. Below are just a few of the agency’s findings:
- Callers cannot avoid obtaining consumer consent for a robocall simply because they are not “currently” or “presently” dialing random or sequential phone numbers;
- Simply being on an acquaintance’s phone contact list does not amount to consent to receive robocalls from third-party applications downloaded by the acquaintance;
- Callers are liable for robocalls to reassigned wireless numbers when the current subscriber to or customary user of the number has not consented, subject to a limited, one-call exception for cases in which the caller does not have actual or constructive knowledge of the reassignment;
- Internet-to-phone text messages require consumer consent; Text messages are “calls” subject to the TCPA;
- Consumers may revoke consent at any time and through any reasonable means; and
- Nothing in the Communications Act or our implementing rules prohibits carriers or Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers from implementing consumer-initiated call-blocking technology that can help consumers stop unwanted robocalls.
The FCC’s intent is to protect consumers from unwanted solicitations via telephone, fax, and text message. However, the agency’s expansive interpretation of the TCPA is likely to increase the likelihood that businesses will unwittingly violate the law and open themselves up to costly class-action lawsuits. Given the liability risk, we encourage business owners to review the FCC ruling and contact experienced counsel with any questions or concerns. Robert Levy, Chair of our Litigation Group, has litigated these issues and is available for consultation.