
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 11, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comSeveral high-profile bankruptcy law cases are currently being deliberated across the country, ranging from Detroit’s historic Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy to any number of large corporate filings. In light of the Oct. 1 government shutdown however – the first since 1996 – consumers, businesses, and third parties alike are wondering how the court system will be affected and whether landmark cases will be allowed to proceed.
The U.S. federal courts have announced that they will continue to hear cases without interruption, despite the government shutdown, albeit with more frugality in mind. The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts reports that the courts will rely heavily upon fee revenues and funds from appropriations that aren’t expiring, in order to allow them to work without delays. The Justice Department noted that its attorneys also plan to postpone non-critical civil matters until the government resumes operations. These steps will enable the courts to function efficiently until Oct. 15. After that, however, full functioning of the legal system may become dicier.
In the Bankruptcy Courts, specifically, judges will continue to hear cases, and attorneys, clerks, and staffers will maintain their responsibilities. Due to a Constitutional provision, judges are automatically entitled to their salaries until Oct. 15, but must obtain authorization from the Secretary of the Treasury if the shutdown continues past this date. With regard to clerks and staffers, however, judges will be permitted to retain employees that are “essential to the resolution of cases.” However, these workers may not be paid until after the shutdown ends.
As each court will have some measure of discretion to determine which personnel will stay on during this period, it is unlikely that bankruptcy law cases whose outcomes may have a large impact on the economy will feel the heavy effects of the shutdown.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!