Scrutiny of the cryptocurrency industry continues to grow, with both state and federal regulators arguing that more needs to be done to protect investors. On October 19, 2023, the New York Office of Attorney General filed suit against cryptocurrency companies Gemini Trust Company (Gemini), Genesis Global Capital, LLC, and its affiliates (Genesis), and Digital Currency Group, Inc. (DCG), alleging that the companies defrauded investors out of more than $1 billion.
Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler made it clear that the SEC also isn’t taking its foot off the accelerator when it comes to crypto enforcement. In a speech delivered on October 25, 2023, at the 2023 Securities Enforcement Forum, Gensler highlighted the SEC’s crypto enforcement successes and vowed to continue pursuing bad actors. “This is a field rife with fraud, scams, bankruptcies, and money laundering,” he said. “It’s reminiscent of what we had in the 1920s before the federal securities laws were put in place.”
NY OAG Suit Against Gemini
On October 19, 2023, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against Gemini, the cryptocurrency exchange founded by the Winklevoss twins. She also targeted Genesis, a significant institutional cryptocurrency lender, involved in the Gemini Earn investment program. Under the program, investors deposited their digital assets with Gemini, and Genesis then lent them out to third parties, promising returns of up to eight percent.
The NY OAG suit alleges that DCG and Genesis concealed losses by entering a $1.1 billion promissory note. DCG agreed to pay Genesis $1.1 billion over a decade with a one percent interest rate. Gemini concealed risky loans from investors, including high concentration with Sam Bankman-Fried’s Alameda, according to the lawsuit. Investors were not informed.
Genesis is accused of hiding over $1.1 billion in losses from investors, Gemini, and the public. In June 2022, one of Genesis’ largest borrowers, Three Arrows Capital, defaulted on billions in loans. Around the same time, Genesis lost more than $100 million from another borrower, Babel Finance. In total, Genesis had lost more than $1.1 billion, according to the suit.
A Closer Look at the NY OAG’s Lawsuit and Its Implications for Crypto Defendants
The NY OAG’s suit maintains that to conceal these losses, DCG and Genesis entered into a $1.1 billion promissory note, in which DCG agreed to pay Genesis $1.1 billion in a decade at only a one percent interest rate. The lawsuit alleges the promissory note aimed to defraud Gemini Earn investors and deceive the public about Genesis’ financial status. “Gemini hid the risks of investing with Genesis and Genesis lied to the public about its losses,” said James.
The lawsuit could have serious repercussions for all of the crypto defendants. NYOAG aims to ban Gemini, Genesis, DCG, and their executives from New York’s securities and commodities transactions. The suit also seeks restitution for all defrauded investors and disgorgement of all ill-gotten gains.
SEC Crypto Enforcement
The SEC initiated a suit against Genesis and Gemini this year for unregistered securities related to Earn. The agency took high-profile actions this year, targeting individuals like Samuel Bankman-Fried and Changpeng Zhao, along with Coinbase Global.
The ongoing debate over when crypto assets constitute securities has not slowed the SEC’s enforcement actions. In his speech, Gessler reiterated his stance that many crypto assets meet the Howie test used to determine whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract and, thus, is considered a security under federal law. “Without prejudging any one asset, the vast majority of crypto assets likely meet the investment contract test, making them subject to the securities laws,” Gessler stated. He argued that crypto intermediaries dealing with these assets are also subject to securities laws.
Of course, many crypto companies do not share the SEC’s stance. Several of the agency’s enforcement targets, including Coinbase, have challenged the agency’s crypto authority. These suits could clarify crypto asset classification as securities, requiring close monitoring by affected entities.
Key Takeaway
Regulators, like the SEC and NY AOG, target unregistered securities and actively combat crypto-based investment fraud. Before financial engagements, both crypto businesses and investors should prioritize thorough due diligence to prevent potential losses.
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
